Gracefully handle neighbor-less LLDP devices #309
No reviewers
Labels
No labels
help wanted
need testing
status: accepted
status: discussing
type: bug
type: documentation
type: duplicate
type: enhancement
type:hardware
type: invalid
type: major feature
type: minor feature
bug
duplicate
enhancement
help wanted
invalid
question
wontfix
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: DGNum/netbox-agent#309
Loading…
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "ribetm/lldp_loneliness"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
lldpd
may be successful but emptyvill not #292 do the same ?
You could say both have similar intents, but #292 is about
lshw
while mine is aboutlldpd
.Also, one notable difference is that #292 uses placeholders while mine simply does nothing if there are no visible neighbors
It's actually closer to this
eb0a3a596f
(from #279) but I prefer my solution since it allows us to support LLDP-compatible virtual switchs like OVSSorry mixed it up, problem with working with 5 things simultaneously.
View command line instructions
Checkout
From your project repository, check out a new branch and test the changes.Merge
Merge the changes and update on Forgejo.Warning: The "Autodetect manual merge" setting is not enabled for this repository, you will have to mark this pull request as manually merged afterwards.