2ef0201e3d
Think I introduced this while reformatting ... Change-Id: Id874f4832ebe2fb2a6aa997ab23fee2775e2bbf7 Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6579 Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su> Autosubmit: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su> Tested-by: BuildkiteCI Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
165 lines
6.8 KiB
Markdown
165 lines
6.8 KiB
Markdown
We've now been working on our rewrite of Nix, [Tvix][], for over a
|
||
year.
|
||
|
||
As you can imagine, this past year has been turbulent, to say the
|
||
least, given the regions where many of us live. As a result we haven't
|
||
had as much time to work on fun things (like open-source software
|
||
projects!) as we'd like.
|
||
|
||
We've all been fortunate enough to continue making progress, but we
|
||
just haven't had the bandwidth to communicate with you and keep you up
|
||
to speed on what's going on. That's what this blog post is for.
|
||
|
||
## Nix language evaluator
|
||
|
||
The most significant progress in the past six months has been on our
|
||
Nix language evaluator. To answer the most important question: yes,
|
||
you can play with it right now – in [Tvixbolt][]!
|
||
|
||
We got the evaluator into its current state by first listing all the
|
||
problems we were likely to encounter, then solving them independently,
|
||
and finally assembling all those small-scale solutions into a coherent
|
||
whole. As a result, we briefly had an impractically large private
|
||
source tree, which we have since [integrated][] into our monorepo.
|
||
|
||
This process was much slower than we would have liked, due to code
|
||
review bandwidth... which is to say, we're all volunteers. People have
|
||
lives, bottlenecks happen.
|
||
|
||
Most of this code was either written or reviewed by [grfn][],
|
||
[sterni][] and [tazjin][] (that's me!).
|
||
|
||
### How much of eval is working?
|
||
|
||
*Most of it*! You can enter most (but not *all*, sorry! Not yet,
|
||
anyway.) Nix language expressions in [Tvixbolt][] and observe how they
|
||
are evaluated.
|
||
|
||
There's a lot of interesting stuff going on under the hood, such as:
|
||
|
||
* The Tvix compiler can emit warnings and errors without failing
|
||
early, and retains as much source information as possible. This will
|
||
enable you to use Tvix as the basis for developer tooling, such as
|
||
language servers.
|
||
|
||
* The Tvix compiler performs in-depth scope analysis, so it can both
|
||
generate efficient bytecode for accessing identifiers, and alert you
|
||
about problems in your code before runtime.
|
||
|
||
* The runtime supports tail-call optimisation in many (but – again –
|
||
not yet all) cases, so you can evaluate recursive expressions in
|
||
constant stack space.
|
||
|
||
* The runtime can give you different backing representations for the
|
||
same Nix type. For example, an attribute set is represented
|
||
differently depending on whether you've constructed an empty one, a
|
||
`name/value` pair, or a larger set. This lets us optimise frequent,
|
||
well-known use-cases without impacting the general case much.
|
||
|
||
We've run some initial benchmarks against C++ Nix (using the features
|
||
that are ready), and in most cases Tvix evaluation is an order of
|
||
magnitude faster. To be fair, though, these benchmarks are in no way
|
||
indicative of real-life performance for things like `nixpkgs`. More
|
||
information is coming... eventually.
|
||
|
||
### How does it all work?
|
||
|
||
Tvix's evaluator uses a custom abstract machine with a Nix-specific
|
||
instruction set, and a compiler that traverses a parsed Nix AST to
|
||
emit this bytecode and perform a set of optimisations and other
|
||
analysis. The most important benefit of this is that we can plan and
|
||
lay out the execution of a program in a way that is better suited to
|
||
an efficient runtime than directly traversing the AST.
|
||
|
||
TIP: You can see the generated bytecode in [Tvixbolt][]!
|
||
|
||
This is all written in about 4000 lines of Rust (naturally), some of
|
||
which – especially around scope-handling – are deceptively simple.
|
||
|
||
As part of our CI suite, we run the evaluator against some tests we
|
||
wrote ourselves, as well as against the upstream Nix test suite (which
|
||
we don't *quite* pass yet. We're working on it!).
|
||
|
||
### What's next for tvix-eval?
|
||
|
||
Despite all our progress, there are still some unfinished feature
|
||
areas, and some of them are pretty important:
|
||
|
||
1. The majority of Nix's builtins – including fundamental ones like
|
||
`import` and `derivation` – aren't implemented yet.
|
||
|
||
2. Neither are recursive attribute sets (`rec`). This isn't because of
|
||
a problem with the recursion itself, but because of the handling of
|
||
nested keys (such as `a.b`). We have a lackluster solution already,
|
||
but are designing a more efficient one.
|
||
|
||
In both cases, we've mostly figured out what to do; now it's just a
|
||
matter of finding the time to do it. Our progress is steady, and can
|
||
be tracked [in the source][src] (viewer without Javascript
|
||
[here][src-noscript]).
|
||
|
||
Apart from that, the next steps are:
|
||
|
||
* Comprehensive benchmarking. We're standing up an infrastructure for
|
||
continuous benchmarking to measure the impact of changes. It'll also
|
||
let us identify and optimise hotspots
|
||
|
||
* Implementing known optimisations. There are some areas of the code
|
||
that have the potential for significant speed gains, but we're
|
||
holding off implementing those until the evaluator is feature
|
||
complete and passes the Nix test suite.
|
||
|
||
* Finishing our language specification. Based on what we've learned,
|
||
we're writing a specification of the Nix language that captures its
|
||
various behaviours in all their tricky subtlety and subtle trickery.
|
||
|
||
Once we can evaluate `nixpkgs`, we're likely to shift our focus
|
||
towards the other areas of Tvix.
|
||
|
||
## The Other Areas of Tvix
|
||
|
||
Speaking of these other areas (most importantly, the builder and store
|
||
implementation), we've made some nice progress there also.
|
||
|
||
While we've yet to start assembling the actual pieces, [flokli][] and
|
||
[adisbladis][] have been hard at work on [go-nix][], which aims to
|
||
implement many of the low-level primitives required for the Nix store
|
||
and builder (hashing and encoding schemes, archive formats, reference
|
||
scanning ...).
|
||
|
||
We're looking forward to telling you more in the next Tvix status
|
||
update!
|
||
|
||
## Outro ...
|
||
|
||
We'd be delighted to onboard new contributors to Tvix! Please take a
|
||
look at the main [TVL page](https://tvl.fyi) to find out how to get in
|
||
touch with us if you'd like to join!
|
||
|
||
Thanks also, of course, to [NLNet](https://nlnet.nl/) for sponsoring
|
||
some of this work!
|
||
|
||
And finally, we would like to thank and pay our respects to jD91mZM2 –
|
||
the original author of
|
||
[rnix-parser](https://github.com/nix-community/rnix-parser) – who has
|
||
sadly passed away. Please, tell people how important they are to you.
|
||
|
||
We use `rnix-parser` in our compiler, and its well-designed internals
|
||
(also thanks to its new maintainers!) have saved us a lot of time.
|
||
|
||
That's it for this update. Go play with [Tvixbolt][], have fun
|
||
figuring out weird ways to break it – and if you do, let us know.
|
||
|
||
We'll see you around!
|
||
|
||
[Tvix]: https://tvl.fyi/blog/rewriting-nix
|
||
[Tvixbolt]: https://tvixbolt.tvl.su
|
||
[integrated]: https://cl.tvl.fyi/q/status:merged+%2522tvix/eval%2522+mergedbefore:2022-09-09
|
||
[src]: https://cs.tvl.fyi/depot/-/tree/tvix/eval
|
||
[src-noscript]: https://code.tvl.fyi/tree/tvix/eval
|
||
[tazjin]: https://tazj.in
|
||
[grfn]: https://gws.fyi/
|
||
[sterni]: https://github.com/sternenseemann
|
||
[go-nix]: https://github.com/nix-community/go-nix
|
||
[flokli]: https://flokli.de/
|
||
[adisbladis]: https://github.com/adisbladis
|