docs(docs/REVIEWS): explain disadvantages of patch submission
There's been some patch submissions gone wrong recently, and piling up in Gerrit. Describe a bit more why patch submission via email is less convenient for both sides. Change-Id: I9dfb5e912511a8b5b828f443c25d5cf36ec5acea Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/9089 Tested-by: BuildkiteCI Autosubmit: flokli <flokli@flokli.de> Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su> Reviewed-by: raitobezarius <tvl@lahfa.xyz>
This commit is contained in:
parent
778bd6894b
commit
387a743944
1 changed files with 15 additions and 2 deletions
|
@ -138,9 +138,22 @@ instance, follow these instructions:
|
|||
5. Submit the commit via email (see below).
|
||||
|
||||
## Submitting changes via email
|
||||
Please keep in mind this process is more complicated and requires more work from
|
||||
both sides:
|
||||
|
||||
You can submit a patch via email to `depot@tvl.su` and it will be
|
||||
added to Gerrit by a contributor.
|
||||
- Someone needs to relay potential comments from Gerrit to you, you won't get
|
||||
emails from Gerrit.
|
||||
- Uploading new revisions needs to be done by the person sending it to Gerrit
|
||||
on your behalf.
|
||||
- If you decide to get a Gerrit account later on, existing CLs need to be
|
||||
abandoned and recreated (as CLs can't change Owner).
|
||||
This causing earlier reviews do be more disconnected, causing more churn.
|
||||
|
||||
We provide local accounts and do SSO with various third-parties, so getting the
|
||||
account should usually be low-friction.
|
||||
|
||||
If you still decide differently, you can submit a patch via email to
|
||||
`depot@tvl.su` and it will be added to Gerrit by a contributor.
|
||||
|
||||
Create an appropriate commit locally and send it us using either of these options:
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue