TODO for modules phase
This commit is contained in:
parent
b81604870b
commit
bd8d00fe13
1 changed files with 25 additions and 0 deletions
25
THOUGHTS.txt
25
THOUGHTS.txt
|
@ -2015,3 +2015,28 @@ everyone can use it.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- also the type_service type defn exists only locally in modules.nix,
|
- also the type_service type defn exists only locally in modules.nix,
|
||||||
and we would like to refer to it elsewhere
|
and we would like to refer to it elsewhere
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Thu Aug 10 21:46:36 BST 2023
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
to finish service/modules milestone
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[done] there are some modules not using serviceDefn
|
||||||
|
- modules included by standard.nix should have all their options
|
||||||
|
grouped together in docs
|
||||||
|
how can we determine which they are? or maybe "modules that
|
||||||
|
don't contain services" is an acceptable criterion
|
||||||
|
maybe this is not actually an issue, if the modules are
|
||||||
|
reasonably coherent. It looks odd now because base.nix is a mess
|
||||||
|
- print the module pathname so people know what to import
|
||||||
|
- docs don't print the examples
|
||||||
|
- and seem to be getting the default wrong too
|
||||||
|
- decide what we deem to be "internal" (if anything)
|
||||||
|
is `filesystem` internal, for example? or `busybox`? they're
|
||||||
|
both mostly _used_ internally but may still be valuable to expose
|
||||||
|
- maybe document outputs separately or not at all?
|
||||||
|
- bridge to be one service instead of two?
|
||||||
|
[done] get rid of services/
|
||||||
|
- anything else in rotuer.nix that we should servicify
|
||||||
|
- services for liminix.networking
|
||||||
|
- a nice way to specify service dependencies
|
||||||
|
- do another video
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue