i18n(france_connect/*): replace wording with i18n
fix(lint): i18n key issue
secu(views/france_connect/particulier/merge.html.haml): sanitize france_connect_email just in case
fix(brakeman): sanitize FCI.email_france_connect when used with html_safe via an I18n.t, also add exception to brakeman
feat(fci.confirmation_code): add confirmation code to france_connect_informations
feat(user_mailer.france_connect_confirmation_code): add confirmation by email mail method/preview/spec, pointing to merge_mail_with_existing_account (reuse existing method)
feat(mail_merge): mail merge
feat(merge.cannot_use_france_connect): same behaviour as callback
clean(fci.confirmation_code): use same token for mail validation as merge
feat(resend_france_connect/particulier/merge_confirmation): resend email with link. also enhance some trads, cleanup halfy finished refacto
clean(tech): finalize story by plugging merge_with_new_account to email validation
fix(deadspec): was removed
fix(spec): broken after last refactoring
lint(rubocop): space before parenthesis
lint(haml-lint): yoohoooo space before =
fix(lint): scss now :D
Update app/assets/stylesheets/buttons.scss
cleanup
feat(france_connect): re-add confirm by email, with an option for confirmation by email instead of only confirmation by email
fixup! Add confirmation by email when merging DC/FC accounts
fix(lint): haml_spec failure
Deep-cloned objects have all their relationships stale. Thus, for a
newly deep-cloned revision, `revision.types_de_champs` returns `[]`,
even when it actually has associated types de champ.
This causes consecutive champs creations and re-ordering to fail in
subtle ways, like:
```
procedure.draft_revision.add_type_de_champ(…)
procedure.publish_revision!
procedure.draft_revision.add_type_de_champ(…)
procedure.draft_revision.move_type_de_champ(…) # this will fail
```
As `publish_revision!` created a new stale revision, moving the type
de champ fails because not all existing champs are found until the
object is refreshed.
We don't hit this path in production, because usually only a single
operation is made in a request.
To fix this, save the new revision before associating it as the draft
procedure.
(Another option would be to `reload` the revision after creation, but
this seems better contained and matches the name of the method.)
We used to pre-validate the procedure, to display in advance if the path
could be used.
Now that the path autocomplete is long gone, we can remove this kludgy
code.
