The check for whether the checkbox should be checked or not was made by
matching the whole string. Thus, given two options 'valid' and
'invalid', the check for the presence of 'valid' would succeed even when
only 'invalid' was present in the values (because
`'valid'.includes?('invalid')`.
The code now checks against the list of items in the selected_options.
Currently, deselecting all values from a multiple dropdown rendered as
checkboxes doesn't have any effect when submitting the form (the
previous values are still there, instead of being deselected).
This is because unchecked checkboxes are not sent by the browser – so
the "empty selection" never gets sent.
Rails `form.check_box` usually works around this by inserting an empty
hidden checkbox element, that will be sent even if all others are
de-selected. But the documentation warns that this is not possible when
iterating over an array (rather than a model). Which is our case here.
To fix this, this commit uses `collection_check_boxes` instead. It will
insert the proper hidden checkboxes in all cases, and fix our use case.
See https://api.rubyonrails.org/classes/ActionView/Helpers/FormOptionsHelper.html#method-i-collection_check_boxes
Before, when autosaving a draft, removing a repetition row would
send `_destroy` inputs to the controller – but not remove the row
from the DOM. This led to the `_destroy` inputs being sent again
on the next autosave request, which made the controller raise
(because the row fields were already deleted before).
To fix this, we let the controller response remove the deleted
row(s) from the DOM.
Doing it using a controller response avoids the need to keep track
of operations on the Javascript side: the controller can easily
know which row was just deleted, and emit the relevant changes for
the DOM. This keeps the autosave requests robust: even if a request
is skipped (e.g. because of a network interruption), the next request
will still contain the relevant informations to succeed, and not let the
form in an unstable state.
Fix#5470
After clicking on a radio button option, it is impossible to revert to
the "None of the values selected" state.
However on non-mandatory fields, reverting to the no-selection value
should be possible.
To fix this, add an explicit "N/A" option.
current year + 50] (or [entered_date; current_year + 50] if old date already entered) because:
The type_de_champ Datetime is used for close future dates and very close past dates (for accident declaration for ex.)
The select currently has a range from 1950 to 2100, so 70+ years not supposed to be used, leading to:
- many bad data entered (0000 or 1950 to not scroll)
- making it difficult for users to give the proper date (current date is lost in the middle of 149 others) so risk to be lazy and select a random one or genuinely make a mistake
Some elements should not be html labels, for example when they include sub-elements that contain labels (ex: a radio button that has a label on its own). Those are replaced with title elements
The main problem come from
%label{for: input_id}
#{champ.libelle}
%span.notice= string_to_html(champ.description)
%input
where string_to_html contains p tags
The proposed solution is
%label #{champ.libelle}
%p.notice
%input
It should be iso in the graphic sense.
Make it more reusable, by:
- Renaming `attachment/update` to `attachment/edit`
- Refactoring the CSS styles into their own stylesheet
- Allow to specify the 'accept' option
