Commit graph

30 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Keirua
1a53bfed62 renommage des tests
Co-authored-by: Pierre de La Morinerie <pierre.de_la_morinerie@beta.gouv.fr>
2020-07-21 17:13:28 +02:00
clemkeirua
d31b4b6848 ajout d'un test sur le telechargement de zips 2020-07-21 15:45:57 +02:00
Christophe Robillard
63dd71aed4 display all avis for an expert 2020-06-30 09:17:27 +02:00
Christophe Robillard
c565c9c87b refactor sign_up_instructeur_avis_url 2020-06-30 09:17:27 +02:00
Christophe Robillard
b0aa005769 remove dead code 2020-06-30 09:17:27 +02:00
kara Diaby
6b07cc0659 Move admin/assigns to the new UI like groupe_instructeurs 2020-06-29 14:44:28 +02:00
Pierre de La Morinerie
4cb747fdb6 specs: always require rails_helper
Test helpers are separated between two files: spec_helper and
rails_helper. This separation is meant to allow tests that do not
require Rails (like testing standalone libs) to boot faster.

The spec_helper file is always loaded, through `--require spec_helper`
in the `.rspec` config file. When needed, the rails_helper file is
expected to be required manually.

This is fine, but:
- Many test files have a redundant `require 'spec_helper'` line;
- Many test files should require `rails_helper`, but don't.

Not requiring `rails_helper` will cause the Rails-concerned section of
the test environment not to be configured–which may cause subtle bugs
(like the test database not being properly initialized).

Moreover, Spring loads all the Rails files on preloading anyway. So the
gains from using only `spec_helper` are thin.

To streamline this process, this commit:
- Configures `.rspec` to require `rails_helper` by default;
- Remove all manual requires to spec_helper or rails_helper.

Reference: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/24145329/how-is-spec-rails-helper-rb-different-from-spec-spec-helper-rb-do-i-need-it
2020-03-31 12:48:32 +02:00
kara Diaby
b32ed88f9b add attachment when instructor asking for a review 2020-03-04 13:35:29 +00:00
Pierre de La Morinerie
6afddd8647 spec: fix a flaky experts feature spec
When "invite linked dossiers" is checked, the invitation will generate
one avis per dossier (including the linked ones).

So when we retrieve the email send to the expert, and try to match it
with the avis record, we need to specify wich avis (the one for the main
dossier, or for the linked dossier).

Otherwise the test is flaky, and sometimes doesn't match the right avis
with the sent email.
2020-02-18 10:44:44 +00:00
Paul Chavard
7afeae1408 remove dossier.linked_dossiers 2020-02-11 17:49:22 +01:00
Paul Chavard
f0ea96772d Only invite experts to dossiers instructeur have access to 2020-02-11 17:38:57 +01:00
Pierre de La Morinerie
e7dd9e36d6 specs: fix Capybara warning
Capybara logs several warnings during tests:

> Locator Integer:243 for selector :link must be an instance of String
> or Symbol. This will raise an error in a future version of Capybara.

This is because we use selectors like `have_link(dossier.id)`, where the
locator is a Number (instead of a String or Symbol).
2019-11-28 12:09:12 +01:00
Pierre de La Morinerie
f131dbb80d instructeurs: make the create form not using email directly
Before the form attempted to read an email value from the Instructeur
model, and failed (because the empty Instructeur had no user yet).

We could let `Instructeur#email` return `nil` if there is no User –
but as a created Instructeur is always supposed to have a User, this
seems like a nice safeguard to keep.

So instead this commit rewrites the create form, which now doesn’t
depend on an Instructeur model. Seems easy enough for now.
2019-11-04 10:44:24 +01:00
Pierre de La Morinerie
d78d206544 instructeurs: fix expert creation not to use Instructeur.email
It kind of worked until now, because the email field is disabled, and
thus never accessed.

But better make it clean, by accessing an object (User) where the email
field actually exists.
2019-11-04 10:44:24 +01:00
Pierre de La Morinerie
1c61f2de58 views: refactor the attachment/edit view
Make it more reusable, by:

- Renaming `attachment/update` to `attachment/edit`
- Refactoring the CSS styles into their own stylesheet
- Allow to specify the 'accept' option
2019-10-31 10:27:19 +01:00
Paul Chavard
86b271997b Invite experts to linked dossiers
closes #3669
2019-10-23 13:10:09 +02:00
Pierre de La Morinerie
f0c2599d18 specs: improve feature spec for experts
- Move the avis feature spec to a separate file
- Add more test cases
2019-10-21 12:57:10 +02:00
Pierre de La Morinerie
0807fed258 specs: rename instructeur_spec.rb to instruction_spec.rb
This clarifies the difference between this spec and the other
instructeur specs in the same directory.
2019-10-21 11:27:35 +02:00
Paul Chavard
2c486b8fe2 Bump some javascript dependencies 2019-10-07 15:40:27 +02:00
simon lehericey
caf1fbca44 Use assign_to 2019-09-02 11:41:12 +02:00
simon lehericey
b541ef0b41 Procedure has many instructeurs with defaut_groupe_instructeur 2019-09-02 11:41:12 +02:00
simon lehericey
c08e356367 Remove or fix nonsense code 2019-08-14 15:08:14 +02:00
Paul Chavard
0969b1f85f Enable email_login_token for all gestionnaires 2019-08-14 12:53:51 +01:00
simon lehericey
a9128895a2 Something wrong with stored location which prevent instructeur to be redirected to user procedure path 2019-08-13 15:15:16 +02:00
simon lehericey
fdbfd3bb42 Add feature spec on instructeur invitation 2019-08-13 15:15:16 +02:00
simon lehericey
ad31822a68 Spec: sign_in with instructeur.user 2019-08-13 15:15:16 +02:00
simon lehericey
65a53909e1 Update instructeur factory 2019-08-13 15:15:16 +02:00
Pierre de La Morinerie
79784089a4 dossiers: refresh the whole header actions bar on status change
This ensure the other state-dependant buttons get updated to–like the
"Follow" or "Archive" button.

Fix #4186
2019-08-13 15:07:22 +02:00
simon lehericey
3fde2a6f70 Rename gestionnaire in code to instructeur 2019-08-12 13:47:01 +02:00
simon lehericey
6902f84b85 Brutally rename gestionnaire filename to instructeur 2019-08-12 13:47:01 +02:00