f868e730be
Maybe I misunderstood this part of the code, but the use of `unsafe` appears unnecessary here? In any event it is the one and only `unsafe` in the codebase. Hopefully getting to "no `unsafe` anywhere" is worth the extra never-taken branch caused by unwrap() instead of unwrap_unchecked()? Signed-off-by: Adam Joseph <adam@westernsemico.com> Change-Id: I33fbd5aad9d8307ea82c24b6220412783e1973c6 Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7011 Tested-by: BuildkiteCI Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su> |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
.vscode | ||
docs | ||
eval | ||
nix_cli | ||
proto | ||
.gitignore | ||
LICENSE | ||
OWNERS | ||
README.md |
Tvix
For more information about Tvix, contact one of the project owners. We are interested in people who would like to help us review designs, brainstorm and describe requirements that we may not yet have considered.
License structure
All code implemented for Tvix is licensed under the GPL-3.0, with the exception of the protocol buffer definitions used for communication between services which are available under a more permissive license (MIT).
The idea behind this structure is that any direct usage of our code (e.g. linking to it, embedding the evaluator, etc.) will fall under the terms of the GPL3, but users are free to implement their own components speaking these protocols under the terms of the MIT license.