BQNLIBS dependency also needs to be provided in the derivation running
all solutions.
Change-Id: I704369127ab92a52c7e4b21de8b7982fb8328f9d
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7662
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Autosubmit: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Didn't end up happening due to a lack of motivation. Will try to finish
the BQN AoC still, though.
Change-Id: Ib296aec9f3cfeef57c79a9ba09fc664c1a19dcff
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7661
Autosubmit: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
This one is not finished yet, but needs to move of this laptop by ways
of git.
Change-Id: I2c8c0a7b581a654f7cfab92dd21ced82a14c5f42
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7616
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Autosubmit: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Part 2 is pretty slow, since we just reuse our fast solution for part 1.
This means we have to check 4000000 which could be reduced a bit by
using a loop. It is tolerably slow, so whatever. (Overall this problem
would have been more fun if the space to check was smaller.)
Change-Id: I1203330fe0364894cfe0318376e583868937b5bd
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7603
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Autosubmit: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
This solution feels very un-BQN-esque, but I could not get it to work by
doing arithmetic operations on an array of indices for any input but the
example one. It's still decently fact considering that we create so many
intermediate arrays at each step.
Change-Id: I883409b4d99d4954312df9b9a9ffc568c39f7726
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7602
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Autosubmit: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
I cheated a bit to skip implementing multi cycle instructions. The VM is
pretty much a normal tail recursive function, but working with scalars
in BQN is on brand-ish. Array programming helps again when drawing the
picture on screen.
Change-Id: I2562c862e228f633c5fad09e503529c6e0785112
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7556
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Autosubmit: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Added utility used to be related, but got dropped in a refactor.
Change-Id: I1f88973d6b42f1302b49cd61c53e4cd1e15b8c6f
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7553
Autosubmit: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Did not have the motivation to go back and improve things, so this is my
initial attempt.
Change-Id: I3e129523d8f6c03bfbe50351f78d56ec7254a2dc
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7539
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Autosubmit: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
By taking advantage of filling (ironically) we can avoid creating a spec
in an ugly way. Additionally we transpose before parsing which doesn't
really make all that much of a difference, though.
Change-Id: Ida593138654f8367d666447f2b62013e8ddff01e
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7535
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Autosubmit: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Today's problem works very nicely thanks to window although the indexing
sadly is off by a constant amount from what we immediately get. I have a
feeling someone is going to demolish my 31 char k solution.
Change-Id: Ia90786ce2fe321235286a85c466decf7feb669ed
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7534
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Autosubmit: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
* take advantage of block header for destructuring
* instead of ModestTake we can split the stack we are picking from into
what we need to move and what to keep, saving us from having to repeat
ourselves.
* remove some unnecessary parens
Change-Id: I1b81a93a27d14dcbb6bdd109e862a356f611aca9
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7530
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Autosubmit: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
First input that is genuinely fun to parse in BQN. There surely is a
nice trick for _ApplyCmd, but this works and I'm unable to think today.
Change-Id: Iefccc81f1c1db03f45e31aaf7a1703ac0f91306f
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7529
Autosubmit: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Uses the same idea as the BQN solution, but is very concise.
Change-Id: I876208e5e86f28240f4a3384d16321fd92d077eb
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7499
Autosubmit: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
It seems to me that there must be some way to improve this further,
but I'm kind of out of time.
Change-Id: Icf3510b6c126345551125543aec70155b6eeff4e
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7498
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Autosubmit: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
We can actually use one and the same scan on the sorted list
to solve part 1 and 2 of the assignment.
Change-Id: I657a81bad6151ef4fe13239db88d2dbd2f9c29d8
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7491
Autosubmit: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Bonus solution in k as I got sniped by leah2.
Change-Id: I806f5b2ac1388159a427bb239bfb1bb7aeb329d7
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7490
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
I currently plan doing BQN and Nix (where it is not too annoying,
respectively). All solutions can either be executed together in a
derivation using CBQN and Tvix (!!!) or executed individually (I'll do
one file per solution for BQN and an attribute set of solutions for Nix
in a single file).
Change-Id: I7cff2ea60d06ae0f586d07779f14f5edd8f87aae
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7489
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Seems to save some allocations and thus recover some performance
compared to the two separate folds we had before.
Change-Id: Ie3d283103e6a9b8aa702db633d9c988fda1b2903
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/4348
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
