Note that Lox does not support escapes, and I don't care about that.
Change-Id: Ie848cbc1164c4b005b15e29aad8fe723aaa68d1b
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/2190
Reviewed-by: tazjin <mail@tazj.in>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
... they're just noisy at the moment. This isn't complete because it
doesn't thread through scanner errors.
Change-Id: I0f75d2b20fa3f57be1af5d1d8aa8059856855825
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/2162
Reviewed-by: tazjin <mail@tazj.in>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
This makes it easier to work with the Unicode issue. The original
string representation can be discarded.
Change-Id: I740be4cb9654679ea7950f3899c5c709b1e7a739
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/2160
Reviewed-by: tazjin <mail@tazj.in>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
... still not that interesting, but at this point slightly divergent
from the book:
The book embraces mutability for interpreter state, initially for
tracking whether an error condition has occured.
I avoid this by instead defining an error type and collecting the
error values, to be handled later on.
Notes: So far nothing special, but this is just the beginning of the
book. I like the style it is written in and it has pointed to some
interesting resources, such as a 1965 paper titled "The Next 700
Languages".
Change-Id: I030b38438fec9eb55372bf547af225138908230a
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/2144
Reviewed-by: tazjin <mail@tazj.in>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
... as well as a Nix derivation, because why not.
Change-Id: Iaf2591ab72676fe0732c3f807b3aa0cff13fb4ef
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/2143
Reviewed-by: tazjin <mail@tazj.in>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
This is going to be the first of two interpreters from "Crafting
Interpreters".
Change-Id: I354ddd2357444648d0245f35d92176dd176525d8
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/2142
Reviewed-by: tazjin <mail@tazj.in>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI