Instead of comparing the enum variants (which does not yield useful
behaviour), compare &str representations of the string instead.
Change-Id: I5e94b5f6c91b4561e1bc7c36d586f3d23c243764
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6112
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: eta <tvl@eta.st>
For cases where the strings are statically known (such as the
oft-occuring name/value), this can be a useful optimisation.
It's also much more convenient in tests.
Change-Id: Ie462b684805bd4986ea5e85ca4bff663bc2d3c3c
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6111
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: eta <tvl@eta.st>
These do not yet test nested attribute sets; we need to add some more
inspection primitives first.
Change-Id: Icfc99bf17c73ebefc0d882a84f0ca73ec688a54d
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6110
Reviewed-by: eta <tvl@eta.st>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
With this change, nested attribute sets can now be created from
literals.
This required some logic for dealing with cases where at a deeper
nesting point a literal attribute set was constructed from an
optimised representation.
For example, this is valid Nix code:
```nix
{
a = {}; # creates optimised empty representation
a.b = 1; # wants to add a `b = 1` to it
b = { name = "foo"; value = "bar"; }; # creates optimised K/V repr
b.foo = 42; # wants to add an additional `foo = 42`
}
```
In these cases, the attribute set must be coerced to a map
representation first which is achieved by the new internal
NixAttr::map_mut helper.
Change-Id: Ia61d3d9d14c4e0f5e207c00f6a2f4daa3265afb2
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6109
Reviewed-by: eta <tvl@eta.st>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
The internal optimisations of the set representation were previously
leaking into the VM, which is highly undesirable.
Keeping it encapsulated allows us to do additional optimisations
within value::attrs without being concerned about its use in the VM.
Change-Id: I7e7020bb0983b9d355d3db747b049b2faa60131f
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6108
Reviewed-by: eta <tvl@eta.st>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
There are some notions of equality (due to e.g. different backing
variants for types, or Nix particularities) that don't work correctly
when deriving PartialEq.
Change-Id: Ide83ae67d051cc0b3ca89cefb283f17d0207acce
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6105
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: grfn <grfn@gws.fyi>
This is required for constructing nested attribute sets at runtime.
There'll be quite a lot of optimisation potential with this solution
eventually, if it should turn out to be a bottleneck.
This introduces a conceptual change, in that the `Value` enum is now
an enum representing "all runtime values" instead of "all Nix language
types". This makes sense in general, as this type will also contain
Chunk representations etc. which are not exposed to users.
Change-Id: Ic5f72b2a0965b146c6a451efad34c6a81ca1aad8
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6103
Reviewed-by: grfn <grfn@gws.fyi>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Users may construct a pair that falls into the name/value optimisation
but where `name` is not actually a string, as from the language
perspective there is nothing special about this attribute set.
We also can not conditionally apply this by forcing the key at this
point, as this would change the language semantics.
Therefore, the name in the optimised representation is also carried as
`Value`.
Change-Id: I5be8a4c98ba19ebdfb7203a929f714a04492512e
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6101
Reviewed-by: grfn <grfn@gws.fyi>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
There might be more logic in the future to encapsulate different
backing implementations of lists as well.
Change-Id: Ib7064fab48bf88b0c8913b0ecfa2108177c7c9fd
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6093
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: grfn <grfn@gws.fyi>
Autosubmit: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Deriving Ord/Eq is required for the ordered BTreeMaps. Once interning
is implemented this will require some extra magic for the sort order,
but that's fine.
Change-Id: I0c654648eb3609a4a01d84868c25f43a4d35bc2e
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6089
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: grfn <grfn@gws.fyi>