I think what might be going on with b/231 is that the annotations
somehow started conflicting because they don't have contexts set.
Lets try setting a context and see if it changs anything ...
Change-Id: I62ed57f9e24f08e4e7215f05d35cfa769e2e2c24
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7640
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Autosubmit: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Profpatsch originally implemented an advisory checker from scratch in
Rust. We now ended up just using cargo-audit for the global checks
exposed via CI and the custom implementation is unused. To clean up
//tools/rust-crates-advisory a bit, we can move the unused parts to his
user directory.
Change-Id: Iacbd27c163edd07c804220fd1b3569c23aebd3e7
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7171
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: Profpatsch <mail@profpatsch.de>
I've elected to split the check-all-our-lock-files script into two new
scripts: One very simple script which generates the report by invoking
lock-file-report on the fake lock file for //third_party/rust-crates and
all lock files in depot, and one which executes this and adds it as a
buildkite annotation if there are any warnings (which is reported by the
report generating script using a non zero exit code).
The latter script could become the basis for generalizing buildkite
annotations, a slight attempt at making it easily reusable in the future
has been made. So far we expect a report generating script to exit non
zero if a report should be made and to print commonmark to stdout. In
the future we may want to use a JSON format for generating the report,
allowing us to filter it by buildkite target (using the drvmap to
exclude certain reports, potentially).
Change-Id: I1df9e440509d69adff5b8e6304105a45dc62c018
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/5260
Reviewed-by: kn <klemens@posteo.de>
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
I think migrating the execline scripts over to bash makes sense:
1. Ever since nixpkgs-fmt, execline scripts in depot have become a huge
pain to write and edit and I can't think of a satisfying solution to
this problem.
2. The scripts here require remembering things across loop cycles (i. e.
the status variable) which is not possible in pure execline. As a a
workaround we used to read the entire report into memory first and
check if it was empty (tying us to the argv limit for the report
length).
Change-Id: I954b08b982ef947f9014a685676d2b83a2aec4d2
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/5259
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Instead of the strict check-all-our-crates, generate a fake Cargo.lock
and add it to the report generated by check-all-our-lock-files.
check-all-our-crates was a reimplementation of cargo-audit anyways and
prevented us from updating the advisory db due to its strict
model (failing on any advisory).
Change-Id: I264a7f1a5058a527cbc46d26225352ecd437a22b
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/5230
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Rename check-all-our-lock-files to tree-lock-file-report and pull out
all the buildkite-specific code which makes the code less awkward.
check-all-our-lock-files is then only executed in extraSteps and runs
tree-lock-file-report on depot, adding it as a warning to the pipeline
if it is non-empty.
Change-Id: If6bd236d90cc680cba0ed4e988f2f28ddb8012d6
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/5229
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: Profpatsch <mail@profpatsch.de>
This script is somewhat usable by humans (it even has a help screen!)
and can be reused in //users/sterni/nixpkgs-crate-holes. We are using
bash since that allows us to exit with the actual exit code of
cargo-audit - something that's not possible in execline.
Change-Id: I3331ae8222a20e23b8e30dc920ab48af78f0247c
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/5228
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: Profpatsch <mail@profpatsch.de>
Many of the vulnerabilities (in the respective crates) reported are not
actually exploitable vulnerabilties of the packages we report them for.
Consequently it is more accurate to state that they are advisories.
Change-Id: I02932125b77fc9c71e583ae49e822fd3438dce05
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/5202
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Autosubmit: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Buildkite doesn't understand GitHub Flavored Markdown and having a read
only checklist in there is probably not much use.
Change-Id: I41538487087e8c817b1a5e653f077bb0fbe6eb47
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/5201
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Autosubmit: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
In the spirit of the readTree filter we should also not include files in
user directories from the outside.
Change-Id: I1abe36a721048900d2758b5986063b68b8d1af93
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/5200
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Autosubmit: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
check-all-our-lock-files works very similarly to
//users/sterni/nixpkgs-crate-holes, even reusing some parts of it, but
is much simpler since we don't need to extract the lock files — they are
already in tree.
It is implemented as a very simple script which just traverses the
subtree of the current directory, collecting all warnings. When
executing this script in buildkite via extraSteps, it never fails,
instead annotating the pipeline run with a warning.
Change-Id: I0a0bc26deffe7b20b99f5aa7238fb3c3bb9deb92
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/3721
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Autosubmit: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
This function is also generally useful for readTree consumers that
have the concept of subtargets.
Change-Id: Ic7fc03380dec6953fb288763a28e50ab3624d233
`our-crates` can just check if the attributes in question are
derivation (i. e. have an `outPath`) instead of blacklisting the
`__readTree` attribute specifically.
Change-Id: I472692e89c0e9eff551372c72a73ab765b0b6599
We have a bunch of crates in `third_party/rust-crates`; it would be
great if we could check them for existing CVEs.
This tool does that, it takes the rust security advisory database,
parses the applicable CVEs, and cross-checks them against the actual
crate versions we list in our package database.
The dumb parser we wrote is tested against all entries in the
database, so we will notice when upstream breaks their shit.
Checking the semver stuff is easy enough with the semver crate.
If an advisory matches, it prints the whole thing and fails the build.
Change-Id: I9e912c43d37a685d9d7a4424defc467a171ea3c4
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/2818
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: tazjin <mail@tazj.in>
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
