This is used to drop an already emitted operation from a chunk again
and clean up its span tracking. This is required in cases where the
compiler has to backtrack.
Change-Id: I8112da9427688bb2dec96a2ddd12390f6e9734c3
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6499
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Refactors the methods used for determining whether an identifier in a
binding (i.e. an `rnix::Attr` node) is a static string, and extracting
it.
Previously all uses of this logic were for `let`-expressions, where
dynamic attributes are always an error. However, we need the same
logic to properly implement the phase separation of attribute set
compilation.
To facilitate this, the actual core logic of these methods now return
`Option`, and are only converted to errors in cases where the errors
are actually required.
Change-Id: Iad7826eff2cb428182521c6f92276310edeae1eb
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6498
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
There's about to be a lot more code for attrsets (hopefully
temporarily as part of an expand&contract cycle), while nested
attribute logic is being refactored in preparation for recursive
attribute sets.
This does not change any functionality.
Change-Id: I667565cd810ca7d9046120d1721c2ceb9095550b
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6497
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
We need to make sure that we compile all plain inherits in a let
expression before declaring any other locals. Plain inherits are special
in the sense that they can never be recursive, instead resolving to a
higher scope. Thus we need to compile their value, before declaring
them. If we don't do that, before any other local can be declared,
we cause a situation where the plain inherits' values are placed into
other locals' stack slots.
Note that we can't integrate the plain inherit compilation into the
regular 2-3 phase model where we defer the compilation of the value or
we'd compile `let inherit x; in …` as `let x = x; in …`.
Change-Id: I951d5df3c9661a054e12401546875f4685b5bf08
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6496
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
This test shows that let bindings' dependencies can form a cyclical
graph, so we need to use thunking to break this cycle.
Change-Id: I2a4de71fd7024f3d3d1166154784139a82f39411
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6495
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
As the new test case demonstrates, asserts need to be evaluated lazily.
Change-Id: I808046722c5a504e9497855ca5026d255c7a4c34
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6494
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
The recent change that split declaration of let based locals and the
compilation of their values did not touch locals bound by inherit in
let. These were previously declared and compiled immediately before
starting to work on the other locals introduced in a let.
In the case of plain inherits, this behavior is kept in this change,
because there's nothing wrong with it: The value of a plain inherit will
always resolve to a higher scope, either statically or dynamically.
Since inherit (from) expression might refer to other locals bound in the
same let, we need to handle them in the same three steps as ordinary let
based locals:
1. We need to declare the (uninitialised) locals.
2. We need to compile the expression that obtains their value. For this,
we create a new thunk, since the from expression may very well return
a thunk which we need to force before selecting the value we are
interested in.
3. Thunks need to be finalised.
For 1., we create an extra pass over the inherits that already declares
and initialises plain inherits and notes inherit (from) expressions in
the entries vector after declaring them. 2. only needs a bit of adapting
to create the thunks for selecting if appropriate, the rest of the
existing code can be reused.
Change-Id: Ie4ac1c0f9ffcbf7c07c452036aa8e577443af773
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6490
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
With this all other "weird scope" logic starts working for `with` as
well.
Change-Id: I0ea1d8c5fbd9cec5084bd574224f77b71ff2b487
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6487
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
This completely rewrites the handling of "dynamic upvalues" to,
instead of resolving them at thunk/closure instantiation time (which
forces some values too early), capture the entire with stack of parent
contexts if it exists.
There are a couple of things in here that could be written more
efficiently, but I'm first working through this to get to a bug
related to with + recursion and the code complexity of some of the
optimisations is distracting.
Change-Id: Ia538e06c9146e3bf8decb9adf02dd726d2c651cf
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6486
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
This struct will be responsible for tracking upvalues (and is a
convenient place to introduce optimisations for reducing value clones)
instead of a plain value vector.
The main motivation for this is that the upvalues will have to capture
the `with`-stack fully and I want to avoid duplicating the logic for
this between the two capturing types.
Change-Id: I6654f8739fc2e04ca046e6667d4a015f51724e99
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6485
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Instead of the reference to the Rc, print the address of the Rc
itself.
Change-Id: I4560598924db7d2864d5c4ae9af847aee2ea7eff
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6471
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Similarly to attribute sets, list elements can be arbitrary
expressions and their (temporary) stack slots during construction must
be accounted for by the compiler.
Change-Id: I3b6f7927860627fd867c64d0cab9104fd636d4f5
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6470
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
The temporaries left on the stack as operands to `OpAttrs` must be
accounted for in the locals array in order for operations within them
to receive correct slots.
Some test cases that were previously broken have been added.
Change-Id: Ib52b629bbdf7931f63fd45a45af1073022da923c
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6468
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
There are more upcomming uses of declare_phantom where this will come
in handy to avoid some code bloat.
Change-Id: I75cad8caf14511c519ab2f56e87e99bcbf0a082e
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6467
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Moves the logic for removing tracked locals from a given scope from
the compiler's locals list, and leaves only the actual
compiler-related stuff (emitting warnings, cleaning up locals at
runtime) in the compiler itself.
Change-Id: I9da6eb54967f0a7775f624d602fe11be4c7ed5c4
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6466
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
This will be re-used between the code paths for
recursive/non-recursive sets, and it might even be possible to unify
it with the logic for compiling `let inherit ...`.
Change-Id: I960a061048ac583a6e932e11ff6e642d9fc3093e
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6464
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
The comment explains how this works fairly well.
Note that this does not yet have the ability to check "closed
formals", i.e. without an ellipsis Tvix will *NOT* fail if unexpected
attribute set keys are provided.
Change-Id: I0d2b77e893243093d2789baa57f876d35d0a32ff
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6463
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
This doesn't actually do anything other than causing errors for the
current state of this folder.
Change-Id: I0af6410e9eb1700cd0b2b105c8adde077d931a69
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6492
Autosubmit: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
... even if the code is broken.
Change-Id: I5898bceaebf201b97e8988c94c90e7fafff82529
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6462
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
As pointed out by sterni in cl/6205, this is actually possible in
syntactically valid expressions like
{ ${12 + 13} = 12; }
Change-Id: Id8a1e3aceb551f288f9050c4eea563eb6572f1a7
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6461
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
As pointed out by grfn on cl/6091
Change-Id: I28308577b7cf99dffb4a4fd3cc8783eb9ab4d0d6
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6460
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
When the last instruction in a chunk is OpCall, make it an OpTailCall instead.
Change-Id: I2c80a06ee85e4abf545887b1a79b6d8b5e6123e9
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6458
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
If the last operation within a chunk is a function call, the call can
be executed in the same call frame without increasing the depth of the
call stack.
To enable this, a new OpTailCall instruction (similar to OpCall) is
introduced, but not yet emitted by the compiler.
Change-Id: I9ffbd7da6d2d6a8ec7a724646435dc6ee89712f2
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6457
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
This introduces a macro to do the forcing, but this solution isn't
very nice and also does not work in all cases yet.
Change-Id: Icd18862ec47edb82c0efc3af5835a6cb6126f629
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6456
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
This produces similar output to the previous tracing feature, but can
redirect the output somewhere else.
Change-Id: I9493c260f480904f3932cb74809b622c24d7be96
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6453
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
These methods make it possible to trace the runtime execution of the
VM through an observer.
Change-Id: I90e26853ba2fe44748613e7f761ed5c1c5fc9ff7
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6452
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
These are required for tvixbolt to work. This interface is definitely
not stable yet, though.
Change-Id: I4076498e8f42311de74ee4f33c93a3ee0c5f8d3a
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6450
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
This type implements an observer that is called whenever the compiler
emits a chunk (after the toplevel, thunks, or lambdas) and prints the
output of the disassembler to its internal writer.
This replaces half of the uses of the `disassembler` feature, which
has been removed from the Cargo configuration.
Note that at this commit runtime tracing is not yet implemented as an
observer.
Change-Id: I7894ca1ba445761aba4ad51d98e4a7b6445f1aea
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6449
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
This trait will enable library users of tvix-eval to observe internal
happenings of the compilation and runtime processes.
The initial methods of the observer will be called whenever the
compiler emits a chunk.
Change-Id: I668f6c2cfe3d6f4c1a1612c0f293831011768437
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6448
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
This is a step towards hiding the internal fields of thunk, and making
the interface of the type more predictable.
Part of the preparation for implementing observers.
Change-Id: I1a88a96419c72eb9e2332b56a2dd94afa47e6f88
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6447
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
With this change, it becomes possible to compile tvix-eval to
webassembly if the `repl` feature is disabled.
Change-Id: Icc0a059964cd0bea2054110c682d50fc5c87ec01
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6446
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
With this, most cases of `fix` in attribute sets will work correctly.
A simple test exercising both has been added.
Change-Id: I70fd431177bb6e48ecb33a87518b050c4c3d1c09
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6437
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
At the point where control flow exits Thunk::force (which may be due
to recursing), it is vital that there is no longer a borrow to the
inner thunk representation, otherwise this can cause accidental
infinite recursion (which will be detected, but cause failures on
valid code).
Change-Id: I2846f3142830ae3110a4f5d2299e9d7928634504
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6436
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
This makes it easier to track exactly which lambda is which when
inspecting e.g. the concrete representation of a thunk.
At runtime all lambdas live in an Rc. To make this print the right
address, the construction of these Rcs had to be moved up right to the
point where the lambda is first emitted (and disassembled).
Change-Id: I6070e6c8ac55f0bd697966c4e7c5565c20d19106
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6435
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
There can be different spans on the same line, so the previous
implementation would duplicate line numbers unnecessarily.
Change-Id: I8d8db77177aee0d834a6ec3584641e1bd5f31c3e
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6434
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
This was fixed by some of the previous commits around scopes. It's
somewhat similar to a few other tests, but I had this one failing
earlier and everything else succeeding, so it is useful to keep it
around for sure.
Change-Id: Ie6cf372b5c805daf992cd87aeb3dfe91542c381c
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6431
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Deferred local upvalues can *only* occur at the same depth as the
thing that is closing over them, but there are various situations with
scope nesting where the actual stack indexes of the local and the
closer look like a deferred value is being accessed.
To fix this, simply compare the depth as well.
Change-Id: Ice77424cc87ab0a2c4f01379e68d4399a917b12b
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6429
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
This is the same as `eval-okay-attrs-simple-inherit`.
Change-Id: I23878accc6cd62c16ec96601239838a385d31306
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6428
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
The condition here was extremely hard to read prior to this change.
As the locals vector is now guaranteed to never be empty (there is
always at least a phantom for the current chunk's root expression),
the logic here can be simplified to just dropping tailing locals
entries while their depth matches that of the scope being closed.
Change-Id: I24973e23bc2ad25e62ece64ab4d8624e6e274c16
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6427
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Similar to setting up a phantom slot when compiling the root value of
a file, closures and thunks need to have a phantom stack slot for the
root of the expression yielded by their thunk to make all accounting
work correctly.
The tricky thing here is that closures & thunks *escape* their inner
lambda context (that's the point!), so the functions emitting them
need to know both the *inner* slot (to resolve everything correctly
while compiling the slot) and the *outer* slot (to correctly emit
instructions for closing over upvalues).
Change-Id: I62ac58e2f639c4b9e09cc702bdbfd2373e985d7f
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6426
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Instead of using a sentinel LocalIdx which potentially points to a
value in the locals stack that does not actually exist, set up an
initial uninitialised phantom value representing the result of the
root expression.
Change-Id: I82ea774daab83168020a3850bed57d35ab25c7df
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6424
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
When deciding whether an upvalue needs to have a deferred resolution
step, the *stack* indexes should be compared - not the locals indexes.
The results are almost always the same, but there are tricky
situations where this can cause errors.
It's difficult to reproduce these errors in isolation, as they depend
on other scope behaviour, so this is one in a series of commits to
address the combination of issues which will gain some tests at the
end.
Change-Id: Iaa400b8d9500af58f493ab10e4f95022f3b5dd21
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6423
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Instead of using sentinel values and an additional bool, this tracks
the identifier of a local as an enum that is either a statically known
name, or a phantom.
To make this work correctly some more locals related logic has been
encapsulated in the `scope` module, which is a good thing (that's the
goal).
Phantom values are now not initialised by default, but the only
current call site of phantoms (`with` expression compilation) performs
the initialisation right away.
This commit changes no actual functionality right now, but paves the
way for fixing an issue related to `let` bodies.
Change-Id: I679f93a59a4daeacfe40f4012263cfb7bc05034e
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6421
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
The slot is now always known (at the root of the file it is simply
stack slot 0 once the scope drops back down to 0), so it does not need
to be wrapped in an `Option` and accessed in cumbersome ways anymore.
Change-Id: I46bf67a4cf5cb96e4874dffd0e3fb07c551d44f0
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6420
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
With this change the runtime trace contains much more exact
information about the context of the computation (entering/exiting
calls etc.)
This is in large part due to moving the tracer to be a field on the VM
itself, which enables consistent ordering of traces across the
execution, and tracing an execution with its *input* instead
of *output* stack.
Change-Id: Ibe525e6e7d869756501e52bef1a441619ce7332c
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6419
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
This makes it much easier to figure out what happened while debugging
this sort of thing.
Change-Id: I2e0e8096709adc647d63c04f213c547c415e5f44
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6418
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
This could occur when the disassembler is enabled and tracing the
runtime while a thunk is being evaluated, as it would not be possible
for the *tracer* to borrow the thunk at this exact moment.
However, we know that if the borrowing fails here we are dealing with
a not-fully evaluated thunk (blackhole), which should just print the
internal representation.
Change-Id: I4bdb4f17818d55795368e3d28842048f488f0a91
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6416
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Previously, "calling" (setting up the VM run loop for executing a call
frame) and "running" (running this loop to completion) were separate
operations.
This was basically an attempt to avoid nesting `VM::run` invocations.
However, doing things this way introduced some tricky bugs for exiting
out of the call frames of thunks vs. builtins & closures.
For now, we unify the two operations and always return the value to
the caller directly. For now this makes calls a little less effective,
but it gives us a chance to nail down some other strange behaviours
and then re-optimise this afterwards.
To make sure we tackle this again further down I've added it to the
list of known possible optimisations.
Change-Id: I96828ab6a628136e0bac1bf03555faa4e6b74ece
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6415
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
If the disassembler feature is enabled, make sure that an Rc of the
codemap is available through the chunk.
Change-Id: I700f27ab665a704f73457b19bd2d7efc93828a16
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6414
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
The casting methods of `Value` are pretty verbose, and actually
incorrect before this commit as they did not account for inner thunk
values.
To address this, we first attempt to make them correct by introducing
a standard macro to generate them and traverse the inner thunk(s) if
necessary.
This is likely to be a performance hit as it will now involve more
cloning of values. We can do multiple things to alleviate this, but
should do some measurements first.
Change-Id: If315d6e2afe7b69db727df535bc6cbfb89a691aa
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6412
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
This makes it possible for builtins to force values on their own,
without the VM having to apply a strictness mask to the arguments
first.
Change-Id: Ib49a94e56ca2a8d515c39647381ab55a727766e3
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6411
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Scope poisoning must be inherited across lambda context boundaries,
e.g. if an outer scope has a poisoned `null`, any lambdas defined on
the same level must reference that poisoned identifier correctly.
Change-Id: I1aac64e1c048a6f3bacadb6d78ed295fa439e8b4
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6410
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
With this, if an error occurs while forcing a thunk (which is very
likely) it is threaded through to the top by wrapping it in the
ErrorKind::ThunkForce variant.
We could use this to generate "stacktrace-like" error output if we
wanted, or simply jump through and discard everything except the
innermost error.
Change-Id: I3c1c8708c2f73ae062815adf490ce935b1979da8
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6409
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Previously error spans were optional because the information about
code spans was not available at runtime. Now that this information has
been added, the error type will always carry a span.
This change is very invasive all throughout the codebase. This is due
to the fact that many functions that are called *by* the VM expected
to return `EvalResult`, but this no longer works as the span
information is not available to those functions - only to the VM
itself.
To work around this the majority of these functions have been changed
to return `Result<T, ErrorKind>` instead and an accompanying macro in
the VM constructs the "real" error.
Note that this implementatino currently has a bug where errors
occuring within thunks will yield the location at which the thunk was
forced, not the location at which the error occured within the code.
This will be fixed soon, but the commit is large enough as is.
Change-Id: Ib1ecb81a4d09d464a95ea7ea9e589f3bd08d5202
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6408
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Get the length of a list
Change-Id: I41d91e96d833269541a1b3c23b7cc879f96d1e5a
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6407
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
First pass at supporting `builtins` for tvix. The following tests appear to be
WAI:
```shell
$ cd tvix/eval
$ cargo build
$ cargo test
```
Change-Id: I27cce23d503b17a886d1109e285e8b4be4264977
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6405
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Another step towards being able to report accurate errors. The codemap
spans contain strictly more accessible information, as they now retain
information about which input file something came from.
This required some shuffling around in the compiler to thread all the
right information to the right places.
Change-Id: I18ccfb20f07b0c33e1c4f51ca00cd09f7b2d19c6
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6404
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
As of this commit, the source spans of all emitted bytecode are fully
tracked.
Change-Id: I4c83deee0fc3f5e6fd6acad5a39047aec693b388
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6403
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
These source spans will always point to the *value* that is being
forced, not the instruction that caused the force to be emitted. This
makes sense so that errors during forcing point at the value and not
the surrounding expression.
Change-Id: I4694414a3281a0de878f71634105b92148ec61f6
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6402
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
With this change, the upvalue data instructions used by finalisers for
thunks and closures track the source span of the first identifier that
created the upvalue (if the same value is closed over multiple times
the upvalue will be reused, hence only the first one).
To do this the upvalue struct used by the compiler's scope now carries
an identifier node, which had to be threaded through quite a few
places.
Change-Id: I15a5fcb4c8abbd48544a2325f297a5ad14ec06ae
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6400
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
This separation makes it possible to annotate the upvalue itself with
the span that created it, which (due to upvalue reuse) is only the
first one for an instance of the given UpvalueKind.
Change-Id: I9a991da6a3e8d71a92f981314bed900bcf434d44
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6399
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
These are again a bit tricky in terms of emitted errors. The main
error is that the condition is not a boolean, which means that the
jump inspecting the condition must derive from the condition itself to
return an error at the correct position.
For other parts of the expression, it is simply the node itself.
Change-Id: I72411630e5d57dfc199f4c3c48afe443fe966322
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6392
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
This one is tricky, specifically the span used for the final jump. I
decided that it makes sense to use the attrpath node, as the final
jump is the one that jumps *over* the default value, so the effect of
this is more closely related to the selector than the default.
It might be more correct to pass through the `or` token itself and
point to this for the jumps, but it depends a bit on what shape of
errors we could end up producing from this.
Change-Id: I29fbc97ba6b9e14e1a0e5f3a7759ddc299dd9c0c
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6390
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
