After ingestion of the contents into the store, this will use the
NonCachingNARCalculationService to create a NAR stream or the contents
of the path, and use our Derivation output path calculation machinery to
determine the output path (using recursive hashing strategy).
In a real-world scenario, we obviously want to cache these calculations,
but this should be sufficient to tinker around with it.
Change-Id: I9b2e69384414f0be1bdcb5a99a4bfd46e8db9932
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/8317
Autosubmit: flokli <flokli@flokli.de>
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Emits the span of the `set` that is being accessed in the `force`
operation of an attribute access.
Looking at traces, it's a lot more useful to get information about
*what* is being forced, as in cases like `foo.bar` it can be
misleading to have an error highlight `bar`, when the error occured
while forcing `foo` to be able to access `bar` in the first place.
Change-Id: Id46ff28f20c67cb4971727ac52cc4811795cea2d
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/8272
Reviewed-by: flokli <flokli@flokli.de>
Autosubmit: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
This reports the span
1. of the code within a thunk,
2. of the place where the thunk was instantiated,
3. of the place where the thunk was first forced,
4. of the place where the thunk was forced again,
when yielding an infinite recursion error, which hopefully makes it
easier to debug them.
The spans are tracked in the ThunkRepr::Blackhole variant when putting
a thunk under evaluation.
Note that we currently have some loss of span precision in the VM loop
when switching between frame types, so spans 3/4 are currently a bit
wonky. Working on it.
Change-Id: Icbd2a9df903d00e8c2545b3fc46dcd2a9e3e3e55
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/8270
Reviewed-by: flokli <flokli@flokli.de>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Autosubmit: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
This is step 1 towards being able to use all 4 spans that we know when
dealing with infinite recursion. It tracks the span at which the
force of a thunk was first requested when constructing a blackhole, so
that we can highlight the spans of the first and second forces.
These are actually the least relevant spans, but the easiest to put in
place, more coming soon.
Change-Id: I4c7e82f6211b98756439d4148a4191457cc46807
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/8269
Autosubmit: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: flokli <flokli@flokli.de>
This produces traces in which we can see what kind of native code was
run. Note that these "names" are named after the generator message, so
these aren't *really* intended for end-user consumption, but we can
give them saner names later.
Example:
https://gist.github.com/tazjin/82b24e92ace8e821008954867ee05057
This already makes the traces a little easier to parse.
Change-Id: Idcd601baf84f492211b732ea0f04b377112e10d0
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/8268
Reviewed-by: flokli <flokli@flokli.de>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Autosubmit: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
When emitting an error at runtime, the VM will now use the new
`NativeError` and `BytecodeError` error kinds (which just wrap inner
errors) to create a set of diagnostics to emit.
The primary diagnostic is emitted last, with `error` type (so it will
be coloured red in terminals), the other ones will be emitted with
`note` type, highlighting the causal chain.
Example:
https://gist.github.com/tazjin/25feba7d211702453c9ebd5f8fd378e4
This is currently quite verbose, and we can cut down on this further,
but the purpose of this commit is to surface more information first of
all before worrying about the exact display.
Change-Id: I058104a178c37031c0db6b4b3e4f4170cf76087d
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/8266
Autosubmit: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Reviewed-by: flokli <flokli@flokli.de>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
This actually uses coercion under the hood in C++ Nix. See the test
for an example.
Change-Id: Id56b364acf269225b6829d0b600e0222f8b3608d
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/8322
Reviewed-by: andi <andi@notmuch.email>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
This was commented out and forgotten during the generator refactor, oh
well.
Change-Id: I474b685159a955a846db462da0dd0067af177b04
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/8321
Autosubmit: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Reviewed-by: flokli <flokli@flokli.de>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Passing in a &proto::node::Node into all this allows us consumers to
keep ownership of the proto::node::Node.
Change-Id: I44882a86c46826b06a8a8a0b24c18adfc7052662
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/8316
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Autosubmit: flokli <flokli@flokli.de>
The behaviour of this function is a bit unintuitive, and cl/8310 already
inlined the other consumer of it.
Rewrite the last consumer of the function, so we can drop it.
Change-Id: I59c8486037ce3f777667d1d9e4f4a9316d5a0cb9
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/8311
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Instead of having two very similar match branches for the FOD and non-
FOD case, detect the FOD case while looping over all outputs.
In the case of anything other than recursive sha256 FODs, the
fingerprint and output path calculation is exactly the same.
Change-Id: Ieb6995653d008766e595cf29d7cd4fb1334e33dd
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/8310
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Autosubmit: flokli <flokli@flokli.de>
Walking the arguments might encounter an `outputs` output, which might
explicitly (for whatever reason) specify the `out` output.
To prevent dropping FOD settings in this case, we have to populate
that part of the configuration after walking the other attributes.
Change-Id: Iee6a7f0a71e9c9699e79d35e6cb19e1ddb49395d
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/8312
Reviewed-by: flokli <flokli@flokli.de>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
This stops using our own custom Hash structure, which was mostly only
used because we had to parse the JSON representation somehow.
Since cl/8217, there's a `NixHash` struct, which is better suited to
hold this data. Converting the format requires a bit of serde labor
though, but that only really matters when interacting with JSON
representations (which we mostly don't).
Change-Id: Idc5ee511e36e6726c71f66face8300a441b0bf4c
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/8304
Autosubmit: flokli <flokli@flokli.de>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Apparently, having multiple packages with the same path is a bad thing:
```
The bin target `tvix-store` in package `tvix-store-bin v0.1.0 (/home/flokli/tvl/tvix/store)` has the same output filename as the lib target `tvix_store` in package `tvix-store-bin v0.1.0 (/home/flokli/tvl/tvix/store)`.
Colliding filename is: /home/flokli/tvl/tvix/target/doc/tvix_store/index.html
The output filenames should be unique.
This is a known bug where multiple crates with the same name use
the same path; see <https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/issues/6313>.
```
Change-Id: Ic785c0349070783baf5e8fd23f5fb60603a3c995
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/8308
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
There's still some shadowing going on, but that's left for a followup
CL.
Change-Id: I02992f1eb494faca99857a3a5ee4dcd47f1b9fd0
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/8306
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Autosubmit: flokli <flokli@flokli.de>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
This will be published on docs.tvix.dev
Change-Id: I348e057351d5295ad20953c9e9a32c257abab089
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/8298
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: flokli <flokli@flokli.de>
The website itself contains no useful information that we don't
already have published anywhere, but it's a decent landing place.
Mostly I want to have something on the root of tvix.dev, so that we
can start using it for other purposes.
Change-Id: Id2b4dabc7f6e4dd26b61484b86dbde2f39aa1719
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/8296
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: flokli <flokli@flokli.de>
This only trims the output paths from a Derivation struct, not the
output hashes.
Change-Id: I9250fec4602ed05bb64540c4a89ddb6fb052be1f
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/8303
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Autosubmit: flokli <flokli@flokli.de>
Call this function derivation_or_fod_hash, and return a NixHash.
This is more in line with how cppnix calls this, and allows using
to_nix_hash_string() in some places.
Change-Id: Iebf5355f08ed5c9a044844739350f829f874f0ce
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/8293
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Change-Id: I8224bf039f739c401900b5a2ddc839810c87cf6e
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/8226
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: Adam Joseph <adam@westernsemico.com>
We settled on this being the most reasonable name for this construct.
Change-Id: Ic31c45461a842f22aa05f4446123fe3a61dfdbc0
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/8291
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Autosubmit: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Reviewed-by: raitobezarius <tvl@lahfa.xyz>
Given Rust's current lack of support for tail calls, we cannot avoid
using `async` for builtins. This is the only way to avoid
overflowing the cpu stack when we have arbitrarily deep
builtin/interpreted/builtin/interpreted/... "sandwiches"
There are only five `async fn` functions which are not builtins
(some come in multiple "flavors"):
- add_values
- resolve_with
- force, final_deep_force
- nix_eq, nix_cmp_eq
- coerce_to_string
These can be written iteratively rather than recursively (and in
fact nix_eq used to be written that way!). I volunteer to rewrite
them. If written iteratively they would no longer need to be
`async`.
There are two motivations for limiting our reliance on `async` to
only the situation (builtins) where we have no other choice:
1. Performance.
We don't really have any good measurement of the performance hit
that the Box<dyn Future>s impose on us. Right now all of our
large (nixpkgs-eval) tests are swamped by the cost of other
things (e.g. fork()ing `nix-store`) so we can't really measure
it. Builtins tend to be expensive operations anyways
(regexp-matching, sorting, etc) that are likely to already cost
more than the `async` overhead.
2. Preserving the ability to switch to `musttail` calls.
Clang/LLVM recently got `musttail` (mandatory-elimination tail
calls). Rust has refused to add this mainly because WASM doesn't
support, but WASM `tail_call` has been implemented and was
recently moved to phase 4 (standardization). It is very likely
that Rust will get tail calls sometime in the next year; if it
does, we won't need async anymore. In the meantime, I'd like to
avoid adding any further reliance on `async` in places where it
wouldn't be straightforward to replace it with a tail call.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D99517https://github.com/WebAssembly/proposals/pull/157
https: //github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/issues/2691#issuecomment-1462152908
Change-Id: Id15945d5a92bf52c16d93456e3437f91d93bdc57
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/8290
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Autosubmit: Adam Joseph <adam@westernsemico.com>
This commit moves fetch_forced_with and fetch_captured_with into the
scope of their only caller (resolve_with).
Change-Id: I9a8bc27228888729d591e8cb021c431b2b6468f5
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/8289
Autosubmit: Adam Joseph <adam@westernsemico.com>
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
This rewrites nix_cmp_ordering as an iterative loop, which
eliminates the extra pinned-boxing helper function.
Change-Id: I33d0ecc913e02affd8fd4c7bc1c9ecfdf4c7deb9
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/8288
Reviewed-by: tazjin <tazjin@tvl.su>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Autosubmit: Adam Joseph <adam@westernsemico.com>
* We no longer need backtrace-on-stack-overflow, as we no longer
overflow the stack with the recent eval refactorings. This was weird
voodoo anyways, introduced earlier to debug some cases where stack
overflows occured.
* default features of genawaiter crate are not needed, as we don't use
their proc macros
Change-Id: I346fc5a18d7f117ee805909a8be8f535b96be76c
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/8263
Reviewed-by: flokli <flokli@flokli.de>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: raitobezarius <tvl@lahfa.xyz>
This reorders the operations in the VM's main `match` statement while
evaluating bytecode according to the frequency with which these
operations appear in some nixpkgs evaluations.
I used raw data that looks like this:
https://gist.github.com/tazjin/63d0788a78eb8575b04defaad4ef610d
This has a small but noticeable impact on evaluation performance.
No operations have changed in any way, this is purely moving code
around.
Change-Id: Iaa4ef4f0577e98144e8905fec88149c41e8c315c
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/8262
Reviewed-by: raitobezarius <tvl@lahfa.xyz>
Reviewed-by: flokli <flokli@flokli.de>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
The name of this was not accurate anymore after all the recent
shuffling, as noted by amjoseph. Conceptual tail calls here only occur
for Nix bytecode calling Nix bytecode, but things like a builtin call
actually push a new native frame.
Change-Id: I1dea8c9663daf86482b8c7b5a23133254b5ca321
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/8256
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: raitobezarius <tvl@lahfa.xyz>
... except now the tests fail, but at least it works
Change-Id: I05e86c173f40533ae65548585c1ddaa200ac5235
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/8214
Reviewed-by: raitobezarius <tvl@lahfa.xyz>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
This file which ships with C++ Nix is required for evaluating nixpkgs.
Like C++ Nix, we now inject a pseudo path in EvalIO from which this
will resolve as <nix/fetchurl.nix>
Change-Id: Ic948c476a2cfc6381d5655d308bc2d5fa25b7123
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/8213
Reviewed-by: raitobezarius <tvl@lahfa.xyz>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI