This check makes more sense there, and gives stronger semantics - Done()
only succeeds if the other side successfully received everything, *and*
came up with the same hashes as we did.
Change-Id: I20b706961053fd00d22cc70e1c8cc859705587e0
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/9542
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Autosubmit: flokli <flokli@flokli.de>
Reviewed-by: Connor Brewster <cbrewster@hey.com>
We can drop most of Hasher if we use a MultiWriter writing to the hash
function and a minimal CountingWriter.
This should make things a bit more understandable.
Change-Id: I37ee72d9a5c73f253aecc1ad761cb723389b89fc
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/9529
Autosubmit: flokli <flokli@flokli.de>
Reviewed-by: Connor Brewster <cbrewster@hey.com>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
This aligns behaviour more with how it should be - it's the
responsibility of the callback functions to return digests of the things
they consume(d). It allows further cleaning up the hasher struct.
Change-Id: I9cbfc87e6abd4ff17fadf39eb6563ec3cb7fcc6f
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/9528
Autosubmit: flokli <flokli@flokli.de>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: Connor Brewster <cbrewster@hey.com>
Make the import function usable on any reader.
Change-Id: I84d2004cb73cdd7a11fe8efb0f2efb6335d5e6b0
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/9527
Reviewed-by: Connor Brewster <cbrewster@hey.com>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Autosubmit: flokli <flokli@flokli.de>