I can review all nix-related changes.
Change-Id: I13e5bb7b523d4b9c79dbe2083d9e23c217466651
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/2308
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: lukegb <lukegb@tvl.fyi>
We have this nice `runExecline` now, so we don’t need to use
`runCommand` (which spawns bash) just to write a simple script.
Change-Id: I2941ed8c1448fa1d7cc02dc18b24a8a945b2c38b
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/704
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: tazjin <mail@tazj.in>
Reviewed-by: BuildkiteCI
The escaping functions are going to be used by both `writeExecline`
and `runExecline`, so let’s move them to their own namespace.
Change-Id: Iccf69eaeca3062573e0751a17c548b7def86196d
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/706
Reviewed-by: tazjin <mail@tazj.in>
Reviewed-by: Kane York <rikingcoding@gmail.com>
This is a writer, similar to `pkgs.writeBashScript` or
`pkgs.writers.writePython3`.
The difference is that we can correctly write all execline scripts by
using nix lists of lists, so the user doesn’t have to care about
escaping arguments (like they have to in bash scripts with
`lib.escapeShellArg` for example).
Change-Id: I2f2874cf61170ddca07b89b692f762725f4a75dc
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/625
Reviewed-by: Kane York <rikingcoding@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: tazjin <mail@tazj.in>
