By taking advantage of filling (ironically) we can avoid creating a spec
in an ugly way. Additionally we transpose before parsing which doesn't
really make all that much of a difference, though.
Change-Id: Ida593138654f8367d666447f2b62013e8ddff01e
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7535
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Autosubmit: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Today's problem works very nicely thanks to window although the indexing
sadly is off by a constant amount from what we immediately get. I have a
feeling someone is going to demolish my 31 char k solution.
Change-Id: Ia90786ce2fe321235286a85c466decf7feb669ed
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7534
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Autosubmit: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
* take advantage of block header for destructuring
* instead of ModestTake we can split the stack we are picking from into
what we need to move and what to keep, saving us from having to repeat
ourselves.
* remove some unnecessary parens
Change-Id: I1b81a93a27d14dcbb6bdd109e862a356f611aca9
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7530
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Autosubmit: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
First input that is genuinely fun to parse in BQN. There surely is a
nice trick for _ApplyCmd, but this works and I'm unable to think today.
Change-Id: Iefccc81f1c1db03f45e31aaf7a1703ac0f91306f
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7529
Autosubmit: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Uses the same idea as the BQN solution, but is very concise.
Change-Id: I876208e5e86f28240f4a3384d16321fd92d077eb
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7499
Autosubmit: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
It seems to me that there must be some way to improve this further,
but I'm kind of out of time.
Change-Id: Icf3510b6c126345551125543aec70155b6eeff4e
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7498
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Autosubmit: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
We can actually use one and the same scan on the sorted list
to solve part 1 and 2 of the assignment.
Change-Id: I657a81bad6151ef4fe13239db88d2dbd2f9c29d8
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7491
Autosubmit: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Bonus solution in k as I got sniped by leah2.
Change-Id: I806f5b2ac1388159a427bb239bfb1bb7aeb329d7
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7490
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
I currently plan doing BQN and Nix (where it is not too annoying,
respectively). All solutions can either be executed together in a
derivation using CBQN and Tvix (!!!) or executed individually (I'll do
one file per solution for BQN and an attribute set of solutions for Nix
in a single file).
Change-Id: I7cff2ea60d06ae0f586d07779f14f5edd8f87aae
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/7489
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
