Instead of tying the popping of the with stack to scope depth, clean
up the stack immediately after processing a with body.
The previous behaviour was actually incorrect, as it would leave
things on the with-stack longer than they were supposed to be there.
This could lead to false positive resolutions in some situations
involving closures.
Change-Id: I7b0638557503f1f71eb602e3d5ff193cdfcb67cc
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6297
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
Fully implements the instructions for compiling closure
objects (without runtime handling yet).
Closure (and thunk) objects are created at runtime by capturing all
known upvalues. To represent this, the instructions for creating them
need to have a variable number of arguments. Due to that, this commit
introduces new variants in OpCode that are not actually operations,
but data.
If the VM is implemented correctly, the instruction pointer should
never point at these. Due to this, the VM will panic if it sees a data
operand during an execution run.
Change-Id: Ic56b49b3a42736dc437751e76df0e89c8d0619c6
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6291
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: grfn <grfn@gws.fyi>
This adds a new upvalue tracking structure in the compiler to resolve
upvalues and track their positions within a function when compiling a
closure.
The compiler will emit runtime upvalue access instructions after this
commit, but the creation of the runtime closure object etc. is not yet
wired up.
Change-Id: Ib0c2c25f686bfd45f797c528753068858e3a770d
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6289
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: grfn <grfn@gws.fyi>
This adds a transparent wrapper around `usize` used for jump offsets
in the opcodes. This is a step towards getting rid of ambiguous plain
`usize` usage in the opcode.
Change-Id: I21e35e67d94b32d68251908b96c7f62b6f56a8bb
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6282
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
grfn pointed out in cl/6174 that `Result` might cause developers to
believe that this behaves like std::Result, which it does not.
Change-Id: Ia30ab0dcb7e8da7bf842777ee3fe17bcf35cb0c1
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6281
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
Reviewed-by: sterni <sternenseemann@systemli.org>
This is a more sensible place for this function to live and makes
upvalue resolution easier down the line.
Change-Id: I48ee39bdcdb4f96a16a327f7015aff60db5b15fb
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6270
Reviewed-by: grfn <grfn@gws.fyi>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
This struct will carry the upvalue machinery in addition to the lambda
itself. For now, all lambdas are wrapped in closures (though
technically analysis of the environment can later remove innermost
Closure wrapper, but this optimisation may not be worth it).
Change-Id: If2b68549ec1ea4ab838fdc47a2181c694ac937f2
Reviewed-on: https://cl.tvl.fyi/c/depot/+/6269
Reviewed-by: grfn <grfn@gws.fyi>
Tested-by: BuildkiteCI
