Adds apologia for switching to Python scripts to README

This commit is contained in:
William Carroll 2017-07-29 22:27:36 -04:00
parent 36d60655f4
commit 18116b415f

View file

@ -7,6 +7,27 @@ The overall goal of this repository is to reduce the time it takes to adopt a ne
Ironically, I prefer to use a Mac or a Linux as my personal computer, so hopefully the connotations associated with, `PC` aren't misleading.
# Python Scripts or Bash Scripts?
Let me start by saying that I enjoy shell scripting. I even love the spirit of shell scripting: a
hacker's preferred tool for quickly piecing together logic to make his or her life easier. As a
staunch supporter of building one's own tools, shell-scripting has been a staple of my programming
career for multiple years. It is, however, this same hackish spirit of POSIX shell scripting that
has motivated me to seek more robust tools.
I have decided to switch to Python scripts in lieu of shell scripts to improve the code readability
and maintainability, and write more powerful cross-platform installation and configuration scripts.
While I do worry that the switch to Python will eventually dull my knowledge of shell scripts, I
feel secure for a few reasons. Firstly, Python is widely available on most computers. Secondly, most
of my day-to-day tasks on the CLI require shell knowledge.
I am reluctant to leave the piping syntax behind, but I am encouraged by third-party Python
libraries, such as [plumbum](http://plumbum.readthedocs.io/en/latest/), that are attempting to
provide this syntactic convenience to Python. This should not be seen as my farewell to Bash
scripting. That is too severe. Instead, I see this as a necessary upgrade for my tooling and my
foray into writing more sophisticated tools for myself and others.
# GnuPG
1. Download public key from keyserver