2020-05-25 17:39:18 +02:00
|
|
|
Nix, or rather tazjin's fork thereof
|
|
|
|
------------------------------------
|
2020-05-17 16:52:38 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2020-05-25 17:39:18 +02:00
|
|
|
Nix is a new take on package management that is fairly unique. Because
|
|
|
|
of its purity aspects, a lot of issues found in traditional package
|
|
|
|
managers don't appear with Nix.
|
2020-05-17 16:52:38 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2020-05-25 17:39:18 +02:00
|
|
|
To find out more about the tool, usage and installation instructions,
|
|
|
|
please read the manual, which is available on the Nix website at
|
2020-05-17 16:52:38 +02:00
|
|
|
<http://nixos.org/nix/manual>.
|
|
|
|
|
2020-05-25 17:39:18 +02:00
|
|
|
This repository is [tazjin](https://tazj.in)'s fork of Nix.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Fork background
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nix is a fantastic project with over a decade of demonstrated
|
|
|
|
real-world usage, but also with quite a few problems.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First of all, the project consists of two main components: The Nix
|
|
|
|
package collection ("[nixpkgs][]") and the package manager itself.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The package collection is an enormous effort with hundreds of
|
|
|
|
thousands of commits, encoding expert knowledge about lots of
|
|
|
|
different software and ways of building and managing it. It is a very
|
|
|
|
valuable piece of software.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The package manager however is an old C++ project with severe code
|
|
|
|
quality issues, little to no documentation, no consistent style and no
|
|
|
|
unit test coverage.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Its codebase is larger than it needs to be (often due to custom
|
|
|
|
reimplementations of basic functionality) and is mostly ad-hoc
|
|
|
|
structured, making it difficult to correctly implement large-scale
|
|
|
|
improvements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In addition, the upstream Nix project is diverging from the opinions
|
|
|
|
of some community members via the introduction of concepts such as Nix
|
|
|
|
flakes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To counteract these things I have decided to fork Nix.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Fork goals
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The things listed here are explicitly in-scope for work on the fork.
|
|
|
|
This list is not exhaustive, and it is very likely that many other
|
|
|
|
smaller things will be discovered along the way.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### nixpkgs compatibility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This fork will maintain compatibility with nixpkgs as much as
|
|
|
|
possible. If at any point we do need to diverge, we will do it in a
|
|
|
|
way that is backwards compatible.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Code quality improvements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Code quality encompasses several different issues.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One goal is to slowly bring the codebase in line with the [Google C++
|
|
|
|
style guide][google-style]. Apart from the trivial reformatting (which
|
|
|
|
is already done), this means slowly chipping away at incorrectly
|
|
|
|
structured type hierarchies, usage of exceptions, usage of raw
|
|
|
|
pointers, global mutability and so on.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Another goal is to reduce the amount of code in Nix by removing custom
|
|
|
|
reimplementations of basic functionality (such as string splitting or
|
|
|
|
reading files).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For functionality that is not part of the C++17 standard library,
|
|
|
|
[Abseil][] will be the primary external library used.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Explicit RPC mechanisms
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nix currently uses homegrown mechanisms of interacting with other Nix
|
|
|
|
binaries, for example for remote builds or interaction between the CLI
|
|
|
|
and the Nix daemon.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This will be replaced with [gRPC][].
|
2020-05-17 16:52:38 +02:00
|
|
|
|
2020-05-25 17:39:18 +02:00
|
|
|
### New sandboxing mechanism
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nix implements its own sandboxing mechanism. This was probably the
|
|
|
|
correct decision at the time, but is not necessary anymore because
|
|
|
|
Linux containers have become massively popular and lots of new tooling
|
|
|
|
is now available.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The goal is to replace the custom sandboxing implementation with
|
|
|
|
pluggable [OCI runtimes][oci], which will make it possible to use
|
|
|
|
arbitrary container runtimes such as [gVisor][] or [systemd-nspawn][]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Pluggable Nix store backends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The current Nix store implementation will be removed from Nix' core
|
|
|
|
and instead be refactored into a gRPC API that can be implemented by
|
|
|
|
different backends.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Builds as graph reductions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A Nix derivation that should be instantiated describes a build graph.
|
|
|
|
This graph will become a first-class citizen, making it possible to
|
|
|
|
distribute different parts of the computation to different nodes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Implementing this properly will also allow us to improve the
|
|
|
|
implementation of import-from-derivation by explicitly moving through
|
|
|
|
different graph reduction stages.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Fork non-goals
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To set expectations, there are some explicit non-goals, too.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Merging these changes back into upstream is not a goal, and maybe
|
|
|
|
not even feasible. The core work has not even started yet and just
|
|
|
|
basic cleanup has already created a diff of over 40 000 lines.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This would likely also turn into a political effort, which I have no
|
|
|
|
interest in.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Improved performance is not an (initial) goal. Nix performance is
|
|
|
|
very unevenly distributed across the codebase (some things have seen
|
|
|
|
a lot of ad-hoc optimisation, others are written like inefficient
|
|
|
|
toy implementations) and we simply don't know what effect the
|
|
|
|
cleanup will have.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Once the codebase is in a better state we will be able to start
|
|
|
|
optimising it again while retaining readability, but this is not a
|
|
|
|
goal until a later point in time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Compatibility with new upstream features is not a goal. Specifically
|
|
|
|
we do not want Nix flakes, but other changes upstream makes will be
|
|
|
|
considered for inclusion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Support for non-Linux systems. Currently Nix support Mac OS and
|
|
|
|
potentially other systems, but this support will be dropped.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Once we have OCI-compatible sandboxes and a store protocol it will
|
|
|
|
be possible to reintroduce these with less friction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Contributing to the fork
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
My repository's default [contribution guidelines][contributing] apply.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In addition, please make sure that submitted code builds and is
|
|
|
|
formatted with `clang-format`, using the configuration found in this
|
|
|
|
folder.
|
2020-05-17 16:52:38 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## License
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nix is released under the LGPL v2.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This product includes software developed by the OpenSSL Project for
|
|
|
|
use in the [OpenSSL Toolkit](http://www.OpenSSL.org/).
|
2020-05-25 17:39:18 +02:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[nixpkgs]: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs
|
|
|
|
[google-style]: https://google.github.io/styleguide/cppguide.html
|
|
|
|
[Abseil]: https://abseil.io/
|
|
|
|
[gRPC]: https://grpc.io/
|
|
|
|
[oci]: https://www.opencontainers.org/
|
|
|
|
[gVisor]: https://gvisor.dev/
|
|
|
|
[systemd-nspawn]: https://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/systemd-nspawn.html
|
|
|
|
[contributing]: https://git.tazj.in/about/docs/CONTRIBUTING.md
|