rename notificationFd to notification-fd

it's perfectly valid syntax and consistent with the s6 spelling
This commit is contained in:
Daniel Barlow 2023-03-04 21:19:30 +00:00
parent 08bed15cf8
commit 5427456c21
2 changed files with 2 additions and 4 deletions

View file

@ -11,10 +11,9 @@ test -n "$contents" && for d in $contents; do
touch $out/${name}/contents.d/$d
done
test -n "$run" && (echo -e "$run" > $out/${name}/run)
test -n "${notificationFd}" && (echo ${notificationFd} > $out/${name}/notification-fd)
test -n "${notification-fd}" && (echo ${notification-fd} > $out/${name}/notification-fd)
test -n "$up" && (echo -e "$up" > $out/${name}/up)
test -n "$down" && (echo -e "$down" > $out/${name}/down)
( cd $out && ln -s /run/service-state/${name} ./.outputs )
for i in $out/${name}/{down,up,run} ; do test -f $i && chmod +x $i; done
true
# (echo $out/${name} && cd $out/${name} && find . -ls)

View file

@ -28,11 +28,10 @@ let
} @ args: stdenvNoCC.mkDerivation {
# we use stdenvNoCC to avoid generating derivations with names
# like foo.service-mips-linux-musl
inherit name serviceType up down run;
inherit name serviceType up down run notification-fd;
buildInputs = dependencies ++ contents;
dependencies = builtins.map (d: d.name) dependencies;
contents = builtins.map (d: d.name) contents;
notificationFd = notification-fd;
builder = ./builder.sh;
};