This makes it clear that `ubus_msg_send()` is only
about sending and queue-ing messages, and has nothing
to do with free-ing.
It can be a bit misleading/confusing when trying to go
through the code and make assumptions about whether a
buffer is free'd in ubus_send_msg(), or is free'd outside.
In `ubusd_proto_receive_message()` the `ubus_msg_free()`
is now called before the `if (ret == -1)` check.
That way, all callbacks will have their messages free'd,
which is what's desired, but confusing, because:
* ubusd_handle_invoke() called ubus_msg_free() before returning -1
* ubusd_handle_notify() called ubus_msg_free() before returning -1
* ubusd_handle_response() called ubus_msg_send(,,free=true) before returning -1
* ubus_msg_send() would call ubus_msg_send(,,free=false)
* all other callback callers would `ubus_msg_send(,,free=true)`
(free the buffers in ubus_msg_send() )
In all other places, where `ubus_msg_send(,,free=true)`
an explicit `ubus_msg_free()` was added.
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <ardeleanalex@gmail.com>
Patch by Delio Brignoli <brignoli.delio@gmail.com>
Both ubusd_free_object (eventually via ubusd_create_object_event_msg)
and ubus_proto_send_msg_from_blob() use the same message buffer.
So ubusd_handle_remove_object builds the payload which gets (indirectly)
overwritten by the call to ubusd_free_object and then sent again by
ubus_proto_send_msg_from_blob.
Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau <nbd@nbd.name>
__init has a naming collision with C++ and prevents ubus_common.h
from being included. Instead, use __constructor as defined from
libubox.
Signed-off-by: Zefir Kurtisi <zefir.kurtisi@neratec.com>
rename the ADD_WATCH/REMOVE_WATCH messages to SUBSCRIBE/UNSUBSCRIBE and change
the message format and libubus API in preparation for adding object notifications
Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>
