This test case adds a new AP device (wlan0_ap) with iw and removes it in
the end. However, the hostapd interface for this netdev was only added,
but not removed at the end of the test case. This could result in
consecutive test cases getting confused with the extra interface, e.g.,
if running WPS configuration steps that get applied to all enabled
interfaces.
Signed-off-by: Jouni Malinen <jouni@codeaurora.org>
Add option to:
- add a new AP on the same phy that the backhaul-sta uses
- run CSA from the parent
Adding a new AP (backhaul/fronthaul) on the same phy we have for
backhaul-sta is closer to the real repeater implementation.
Add a test case for that and run CSA.
This is a common problem when we have on the same phy:
- connected backhaul STA
- we started fronthaul/backhaul AP
- we receive (from parent) CSA on the STA interface
This is multi_ap_wps_shared_apdev_csa test case, which fails today with
both mac80211_hwsim and ath9k. To avoid always failing test cases,
ignore this failure for now. Full validation can be enabled once the
issue behind this is fixed.
Signed-off-by: Janusz Dziedzic <janusz.dziedzic@gmail.com>
Pass the backhaul parameters as a parameter. This is in preparation for
channel switch test for Multi AP.
Signed-off-by: Janusz Dziedzic <janusz.dziedzic@gmail.com>
This makes it more convenient to run tests with builds that disable
TKIP/WPA(v1) support completely.
Signed-off-by: Jouni Malinen <jouni@codeaurora.org>
Now that the backhaul STA Multi-AP association is not rejected anymore
by the AP, update the test case to expect disconnection to be triggered
by the STA.
Signed-off-by: Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind) <arnout@mind.be>
With just one additional argument, the run_multi_ap_association()
function can be used for all tests.
Signed-off-by: Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind) <arnout@mind.be>
