Add a workaround to clanc static analyzer warning
dl_list_del() followed by dl_list_add() seemed to confuse clang static analyzer somehow, so explicitly check for the prev pointer to be non-NULL to avoid an incorrect warning. Signed-off-by: Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi>
This commit is contained in:
parent
3e9fa3be62
commit
f4452cc2b1
1 changed files with 12 additions and 0 deletions
|
@ -391,6 +391,18 @@ void pmksa_candidate_add(struct wpa_sm *sm, const u8 *bssid,
|
||||||
dl_list_for_each(pos, &sm->pmksa_candidates,
|
dl_list_for_each(pos, &sm->pmksa_candidates,
|
||||||
struct rsn_pmksa_candidate, list) {
|
struct rsn_pmksa_candidate, list) {
|
||||||
if (cand->priority <= pos->priority) {
|
if (cand->priority <= pos->priority) {
|
||||||
|
if (!pos->list.prev) {
|
||||||
|
/*
|
||||||
|
* This cannot really happen in pracrice since
|
||||||
|
* pos was fetched from the list and the prev
|
||||||
|
* pointer must be set. It looks like clang
|
||||||
|
* static analyzer gets confused with the
|
||||||
|
* dl_list_del(&cand->list) call above and ends
|
||||||
|
* up assuming pos->list.prev could be NULL.
|
||||||
|
*/
|
||||||
|
os_free(cand);
|
||||||
|
return;
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
dl_list_add(pos->list.prev, &cand->list);
|
dl_list_add(pos->list.prev, &cand->list);
|
||||||
cand = NULL;
|
cand = NULL;
|
||||||
break;
|
break;
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue