tests: Make scan_hidden more robust under heavy CPU load
It is possible for the Probe Response frame wait to time out when active scanning is used under heavy CPU load. Make this test case more robust by trying multiple times before declaring the scan for a hidden SSID to have failed. Signed-off-by: Jouni Malinen <j@w1.fi>
This commit is contained in:
parent
2ec82e67c1
commit
29bac7cb89
1 changed files with 10 additions and 2 deletions
|
@ -427,8 +427,16 @@ def test_scan_hidden(dev, apdev):
|
|||
if "test-scan" in dev[0].request("SCAN_RESULTS"):
|
||||
raise Exception("BSS unexpectedly found in scan")
|
||||
|
||||
check_scan(dev[0], "scan_id=%d,%d,%d freq=2412 use_id=1" % (id1, id2, id3))
|
||||
if "test-scan" not in dev[0].request("SCAN_RESULTS"):
|
||||
# Allow multiple attempts to be more robust under heavy CPU load that can
|
||||
# result in Probe Response frames getting sent only after the station has
|
||||
# already stopped waiting for the response on the channel.
|
||||
found = False
|
||||
for i in range(10):
|
||||
check_scan(dev[0], "scan_id=%d,%d,%d freq=2412 use_id=1" % (id1, id2, id3))
|
||||
if "test-scan" in dev[0].request("SCAN_RESULTS"):
|
||||
found = True
|
||||
break
|
||||
if not found:
|
||||
raise Exception("BSS not found in scan")
|
||||
|
||||
if "FAIL" not in dev[0].request("SCAN scan_id=1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17"):
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue