feat(fci.confirmation_code): add confirmation code to france_connect_informations
feat(user_mailer.france_connect_confirmation_code): add confirmation by email mail method/preview/spec, pointing to merge_mail_with_existing_account (reuse existing method)
feat(mail_merge): mail merge
feat(merge.cannot_use_france_connect): same behaviour as callback
clean(fci.confirmation_code): use same token for mail validation as merge
feat(resend_france_connect/particulier/merge_confirmation): resend email with link. also enhance some trads, cleanup halfy finished refacto
clean(tech): finalize story by plugging merge_with_new_account to email validation
fix(deadspec): was removed
fix(spec): broken after last refactoring
lint(rubocop): space before parenthesis
lint(haml-lint): yoohoooo space before =
fix(lint): scss now :D
Update app/assets/stylesheets/buttons.scss
cleanup
feat(france_connect): re-add confirm by email, with an option for confirmation by email instead of only confirmation by email
fixup! Add confirmation by email when merging DC/FC accounts
fix(lint): haml_spec failure
Calling business logic in a factory is a code-smell, because it
usually requires the object to be saved into database, and may have
unintended consequences when the business logic is changed.
Also, this allows to just build a published procedure, without saving it
to the database.
Although we already ignore "invalid recipient" errors, a new type
of error recently popped: the mail service responds with
> Net::SMTPServerBusy '400 unexpected recipients: want atleast 1, got 0'
We want to also ignore this kind of errors.
Test helpers are separated between two files: spec_helper and
rails_helper. This separation is meant to allow tests that do not
require Rails (like testing standalone libs) to boot faster.
The spec_helper file is always loaded, through `--require spec_helper`
in the `.rspec` config file. When needed, the rails_helper file is
expected to be required manually.
This is fine, but:
- Many test files have a redundant `require 'spec_helper'` line;
- Many test files should require `rails_helper`, but don't.
Not requiring `rails_helper` will cause the Rails-concerned section of
the test environment not to be configured–which may cause subtle bugs
(like the test database not being properly initialized).
Moreover, Spring loads all the Rails files on preloading anyway. So the
gains from using only `spec_helper` are thin.
To streamline this process, this commit:
- Configures `.rspec` to require `rails_helper` by default;
- Remove all manual requires to spec_helper or rails_helper.
Reference: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/24145329/how-is-spec-rails-helper-rb-different-from-spec-spec-helper-rb-do-i-need-it
