Test helpers are separated between two files: spec_helper and
rails_helper. This separation is meant to allow tests that do not
require Rails (like testing standalone libs) to boot faster.
The spec_helper file is always loaded, through `--require spec_helper`
in the `.rspec` config file. When needed, the rails_helper file is
expected to be required manually.
This is fine, but:
- Many test files have a redundant `require 'spec_helper'` line;
- Many test files should require `rails_helper`, but don't.
Not requiring `rails_helper` will cause the Rails-concerned section of
the test environment not to be configured–which may cause subtle bugs
(like the test database not being properly initialized).
Moreover, Spring loads all the Rails files on preloading anyway. So the
gains from using only `spec_helper` are thin.
To streamline this process, this commit:
- Configures `.rspec` to require `rails_helper` by default;
- Remove all manual requires to spec_helper or rails_helper.
Reference: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/24145329/how-is-spec-rails-helper-rb-different-from-spec-spec-helper-rb-do-i-need-it
- as a user, it should not display the administration info
- as an instructeur, it should display the administration info
- it should render the proper view with no crash
Make the default behavior of `update_brouillon` be to update the draft,
instead of submitting the dossier.
This makes all requests made to `update_brouillon` without specifying
an extra `submit_draft` parameter to just save the draft. It will make
autosaving the draft easier and safer.
Sometimes, when using nested attributes, touch doesn’t propagate to
parent relationships. (see https://github.com/rails/rails/issues/26726)
Specifically, this happens in our app when updating a dossier with
only new attachements (but without changing the value of any fields).
To work around this, we need to define the parent relationship
explicitely. This is good practice anyway.
Fix#3906
Rationale:
- is true for only 0.06% of Dossiers
- is not displayed anymore anyways
- will be a rare case for now
* FC adoption is not insane
* FC used more for personal than professional
matters
* not always the mandataires sociaux that fill
dossiers for their companies, so not that
relevant
- we can add it back later
