scan-build from clang-9 has reported following:
libubox/list.h:83:22: warning: Use of memory after it is freed
entry->next->prev = entry->prev;
^~~~~~~~~~~
ubusd_event.c:42:3: warning: Use of memory after it is freed
ubusd_delete_event_source(ev);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Which might be a false positives, but in order to make the code pass the
static analyzer checks, rewrite the while loops on lists with the safe
list iterator.
Signed-off-by: Petr Štetiar <ynezz@true.cz>
clang-9 on x86/64 has reported following warnings/errors:
libubus-acl.c:123:2: error: comparison of integers of different signs: 'size_t' (aka 'unsigned long') and 'int' [-Werror,-Wsign-compare]
libubus-io.c:108:18: error: comparison of integers of different signs: 'int' and 'size_t' (aka 'unsigned long') [-Werror,-Wsign-compare]
libubus-io.c:395:56: error: comparison of integers of different signs: 'ssize_t' (aka 'long') and 'size_t' (aka 'unsigned long') [-Werror,-Wsign-compare]
libubus-req.c:441:4: error: comparison of integers of different signs: 'size_t' (aka 'unsigned long') and 'int' [-Werror,-Wsign-compare]
ubusd_acl.c:119:18: error: comparison of integers of different signs: 'int' and 'unsigned long' [-Werror,-Wsign-compare]
ubusd_acl.c:152:5: error: comparison of integers of different signs: 'size_t' (aka 'unsigned long') and 'int' [-Werror,-Wsign-compare]
ubusd_acl.c:348:3: error: comparison of integers of different signs: 'size_t' (aka 'unsigned long') and 'int' [-Werror,-Wsign-compare]
ubusd_acl.c:352:3: error: comparison of integers of different signs: 'size_t' (aka 'unsigned long') and 'int' [-Werror,-Wsign-compare]
ubusd_acl.c:357:3: error: comparison of integers of different signs: 'size_t' (aka 'unsigned long') and 'int' [-Werror,-Wsign-compare]
ubusd_acl.c:362:3: error: comparison of integers of different signs: 'size_t' (aka 'unsigned long') and 'int' [-Werror,-Wsign-compare]
ubusd_acl.c:367:3: error: comparison of integers of different signs: 'size_t' (aka 'unsigned long') and 'int' [-Werror,-Wsign-compare]
ubusd_acl.c:447:16: error: comparison of integers of different signs: 'int' and '__size_t' (aka 'unsigned long') [-Werror,-Wsign-compare]
ubusd_acl.c:502:18: error: comparison of integers of different signs: 'int' and 'unsigned long' [-Werror,-Wsign-compare]
ubusd.c:123:13: error: comparison of integers of different signs: 'int' and 'unsigned long' [-Werror,-Wsign-compare]
ubusd.c:170:15: error: comparison of integers of different signs: 'int' and 'unsigned long' [-Werror,-Wsign-compare]
ubusd.c:262:43: error: comparison of integers of different signs: 'int' and 'unsigned long' [-Werror,-Wsign-compare]
ubusd.c:287:30: error: comparison of integers of different signs: 'int' and 'unsigned long' [-Werror,-Wsign-compare]
ubusd_event.c:170:18: error: comparison of integers of different signs: 'int' and 'unsigned long' [-Werror,-Wsign-compare]
ubusd_obj.c:71:2: error: comparison of integers of different signs: 'size_t' (aka 'unsigned long') and 'int' [-Werror,-Wsign-compare]
Signed-off-by: Petr Štetiar <ynezz@true.cz>
UBUS_MSG_INVOKE and UBUS_MSG_DATA can be sent without UBUS_ATTR_DATA
present. Most ubus users assume that the msg argument passed can never
be NULL, so this change prevents a crash
Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau <nbd@nbd.name>
uloop_cancelled was used for two purposes within ubus_complete_request:
- interrupting recursive requests on SIGINT/SIGTERM
- breaking out of the poll loop in a recursive request that completed
Saving/restorung uloop_cancelled was buggy, leading to SIGTERM not being
processed properly. Simplify the logic by using a separate field for
internal use
Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau <nbd@nbd.name>
Context: 1 loop with a single ubus_invoke() that times out calls
uloop_end() which ends the loop, and thus ends the application.
Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>
This fixes recursion problems on config reload in netifd and simplifies
application handling of requests
Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>
When synchronous request completion loops are running, the innermost
loop can receive events that can unblock the outer loops, however the
loop clears uloop_cancelled (which is set by the request completion).
This causes the event loop to continue running even while a completion
loop has already been unblocked.
Fix this by not clearing uloop_cancelled for inner loops
Signed-off-by: Felix Fietkau <nbd@openwrt.org>