amelioration(email_event): re-lever une erreur dans un rescue_from ne la fait pas remonter. change de stratégie pour savoir si oui ou non un mail a ete envoye avec success.
Comme on intercepte chaque `StandardError` pour le monitoring des mails
en erreur, l'erreur n'était plus visible par le job, et les emails
étaient perdus.
A la place on re-raise une autre erreur pour que le job échoue afin de
retry plus tard. Pour ne pas être "avalée" par le rescue_from,
cette erreur doit héritée d'`Exception` plutôt que `StandardError`.
NB: il faudrait parvenir à écrire un test pour vérifier ce comportement.
Pour être vérifié en dev, il faut activer `raise_delivery_errors`
comme en production.
* add base controller for public api
* add dossiers controller with basic checks
* create the dossier
* ensure content-type is json
* prefill dossier with given values
* mark a dossier as prefilled
When a dossier is prefilled, it's allowed not to have a user.
Plus, we add a secure token to the dossier, which we will need later to set a
user after sign in / sign up.
* set user as owner of an orphan prefilled dossier
When a visitor comes from the dossier_url answered by the public api,
the dossier is orphan:
- when the user is already authenticated: they become the owner
- when the user is not authenticated: they can sign in / sign up / france_connect
and then they become the owner
So here is the procedure:
- allow to sign in / sign up / france connect when user is unauthenticated
- set dossier ownership when the dossier is orphan
- check dossier ownership when the dossier is not
- redirect to brouillon path when user is signed in and owner
* mark the dossier as prefilled when it's prefilled
(even with a GET request, because it will be useful later on, for
exmample in order to cleanup the unused prefilled dossiers)
* system spec: prefilling dossier with post request
feat(fci.confirmation_code): add confirmation code to france_connect_informations
feat(user_mailer.france_connect_confirmation_code): add confirmation by email mail method/preview/spec, pointing to merge_mail_with_existing_account (reuse existing method)
feat(mail_merge): mail merge
feat(merge.cannot_use_france_connect): same behaviour as callback
clean(fci.confirmation_code): use same token for mail validation as merge
feat(resend_france_connect/particulier/merge_confirmation): resend email with link. also enhance some trads, cleanup halfy finished refacto
clean(tech): finalize story by plugging merge_with_new_account to email validation
fix(deadspec): was removed
fix(spec): broken after last refactoring
lint(rubocop): space before parenthesis
lint(haml-lint): yoohoooo space before =
fix(lint): scss now :D
Update app/assets/stylesheets/buttons.scss
cleanup
feat(france_connect): re-add confirm by email, with an option for confirmation by email instead of only confirmation by email
fixup! Add confirmation by email when merging DC/FC accounts
fix(lint): haml_spec failure
Calling business logic in a factory is a code-smell, because it
usually requires the object to be saved into database, and may have
unintended consequences when the business logic is changed.
Also, this allows to just build a published procedure, without saving it
to the database.
Although we already ignore "invalid recipient" errors, a new type
of error recently popped: the mail service responds with
> Net::SMTPServerBusy '400 unexpected recipients: want atleast 1, got 0'
We want to also ignore this kind of errors.
Test helpers are separated between two files: spec_helper and
rails_helper. This separation is meant to allow tests that do not
require Rails (like testing standalone libs) to boot faster.
The spec_helper file is always loaded, through `--require spec_helper`
in the `.rspec` config file. When needed, the rails_helper file is
expected to be required manually.
This is fine, but:
- Many test files have a redundant `require 'spec_helper'` line;
- Many test files should require `rails_helper`, but don't.
Not requiring `rails_helper` will cause the Rails-concerned section of
the test environment not to be configured–which may cause subtle bugs
(like the test database not being properly initialized).
Moreover, Spring loads all the Rails files on preloading anyway. So the
gains from using only `spec_helper` are thin.
To streamline this process, this commit:
- Configures `.rspec` to require `rails_helper` by default;
- Remove all manual requires to spec_helper or rails_helper.
Reference: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/24145329/how-is-spec-rails-helper-rb-different-from-spec-spec-helper-rb-do-i-need-it